H uman Resource Strategy
Second Quarter ****
Understanding Employee
Attraction and Retention As Key
Drivers in a Down Economy
N
ews of the state of the economy is flooding
the marketplace with startling and increasing
unemployment rates, speculation of mass
layoffs, buyouts and bankruptcies. It makes for nervous
chatter at the water cooler and on blogs but different
Stacey Randall
chatter in the C-suite and management ranks.
IMR Research Group Inc.
Among the more savvy and forward-thinking execu-
tives there is an increase in discussion centered on the
new and unprecedented opportunity to acquire top
talent. Talent is flooding the marketplace and according
to the Corporate Executive Board, 24 percent of corpo-
rate leaders said making critical talent plays will be one
of their biggest challenges in 2009 (Corporate Executive
Board 2009).
The study also found that one in four top high-
performing employees expects to leave his/her current
job in the next 12 months, up from one in 10 during the
12 months previous to the study. Considering the cost
of turnover, loss of productivity and how employee
engagement and loyalty strongly influences the orga-
nization s financial health, and combining those factors
Contents WorldatWork 2009. Reprinted from WorldatWork Journal, Second Quarter 2009, with permission from WorldatWork.
Content is licensed for use by purchaser only. No part of this article may be reproduced, excerpted or redistributed in any form
without express written permission from WorldatWork. To obtain permission, or to order electronic or print presentation-ready
copies for distribution to colleagues, clients or customers, contact Gail Hallman, ********@***.********.*** at Sheridan Press, 877-***-****
717-***-****, ext. 8175. www.worldatwork.org
with the need for an organization to be able to emerge stronger from this economic
downturn, understanding employee motivation becomes critical.
The economic recession is uncovering a unique opportunity to garner top talent
and is placing retention efforts at the forefront of forward-thinking management
discussions. Management, including total rewards professionals, must be careful to
avoid the thought that the recession will finally make those employees feel lucky
to have a job and remove their sense of entitlement. Assuming the employees
will fall in line is a dangerous and slippery slope managers and/or leaders can
easily find themselves sliding down, with negative consequences. An organization
or its management with this attitude, may find that the best employees are biding
their time until the economy improves and they exit the organization. According
to a 2008 Leadership IQ study, 47 percent of top performers are actively looking
for a job, but only 18 percent of low performers are.
Based on a survey by IMR Research Group Inc. (2008) of more than 1,900
full-time employees in the United States, the key to understanding employee
motivation lies in an analysis of both what employees say is important in the
workplace as well as what drives employee loyalty. IMR Research Group uses
multitiered assessment of employee loyalty through a model called the Employee
Motivator Matrix (EMM).
U NDERSTANDING THE MODEL
Looking at what employees say is important as well as determining the factors
that actually drive loyalty gives organizations a focused, yet big-picture view of
employee motivation and engagement. In the IMR survey, employees were asked
to rate the importance of the 44 workplace attributes, ranging from a high degree
of trust between management and employees to creativity and independent
thinking is valued to a relaxed work environment. The rating of each workplace
attribute combined with how strongly it influences loyalty to an organization
(based on statistical analysis) determines where on the EMM the attributes fall.
While the information is used by the authors company for its EMM tool, the ratings
provide solid input for organizational evaluation of loyalty.
Figure 1 on page 42 provides two dimensions. Stated importance (the bottom
axis) reflects what employees explicitly indicate is important to them when rating
the workplace attributes (i.e., articulated, on-the-surface motivators). Derived
importance or unarticulated importance (the left axis) is determined using
statistical analysis, obtained by computing the degree of correlation between
the attributes with the likelihood of recommending the company to others as a
good place to work an attribute that the authors consider the best measure
of loyalty. Attributes in each quadrant are important to understand, but focusing
resources on the workplace attributes in the top right quadrant, which are high
in stated importance as well as strongly correlated with loyalty, will effectively
increase loyalty and reduce turnover.
Second Quarter 2009 41
FIGURE 1 Metrics Used to Evaluate Pay and Reward Program Success
A dded Value/Unspoken Motivators Key driver/high impact on loyalty
L eadership with vision H igh level of trust between management
High
and employees
V ision/goals/mission clearly communicated
I nfluence on goals/strategy related to job
C reativity and independent thinking valued
Professional development encouraged
C ontinuous innovation viewed as vital
Derived Importance
E mpowered to use own judgment
O rganization reflects the employee s
values, aspirations and beliefs N ew ideas encouraged and tried out
Passionate and motivated employees
Low-Yield Attribute Expected/Minimum Requirement
A ll other 26 attributes measured R ecognizes/rewards excellent performance
O pen communications across all levels
Low
O pportunities for advancement
G ood benefits
G enerous paid time off
Fair compensation for job asked to do
R easonable number of hours worked
Low High
Stated Importance
KEY DRIVERS
In any economy, retaining top talent should be a priority, but it is especially
important in a recession. But trying to figure out how to retain talent, and recruit
when needed, can become overwhelming when an organization is faced with
many possible workplace areas on which to focus resources. However, resources
focused on the key motivating drivers will increase employee loyalty and satisfac-
tion and boost retention rates.
The Trust Factor
Trust is a key driver of employee loyalty and engagement, as shown by its placement
in the top right quadrant of Figure 1. Numerous research studies in recent years
have consistently shown trust to be of critical importance to today s workers. When
employees lack trust in management, productivity decreases, morale sinks and an
us versus them culture emerges, undermining an organization s health and future.
According to the Institute for Corporate Productivity (i4cp) (WorldatWork 2008),
most organizations recognize that trust is an important consideration in their success,
but many employees don t feel it is being nurtured internally. The main culprit is
senior-management credibility, which is seen as a problem in a quarter of companies.
In the institute s study of hundreds of companies, one of five respondents does not
feel his or her organization engenders trust. Forty percent thought trust is nurtured
42 WorldatWork Journal
only to a moderate extent. When segmented between low- and high-performing
companies, the difference is starker: Forty percent of low-performing companies
feel their organizations do not nurture trust, while only 16 percent of respondents
from high-performing companies feel the same.
A solid strategy to increase trust, and reduce time wasted, rests in providing an open
and transparent working environment that strengthens the organization, as employees
spend less time engaging in distracting chatter and more time in productive work.
Other Key Drivers
Employees also indicate that they need to influence goals and strategy; feel
empowered to use their own judgment; and find that new ideas are encour-
aged. One way to know if the organization s employees feel empowered and
influence their work is how they express opinions of their work. For example,
do they use the word own or portray ownership in referencing their projects
and responsibilities? Employee opinion surveys are also significant in this area.
Another key driver is offering professional development, and organizations
making professional development a high priority and an ongoing endeavor will
capitalize on strengthening employee loyalty.
Addressing the key motivation drivers will result in more motivated employees.
IMR s research indicates that in this economy focus is renewed on working
with passionate and motivated employees, as this affects the day-to-day life within
an organization and directly influences the happiness and focus of employees. It has
become imperative for organizations to keep an eye on the morale of their workforce
and work to keep it positive through effective communication about the state of the
organization, the industry and the employee s role in the organization.
Unspoken Motivators
T he key drivers previously discussed are articulated by employees as important.
Equally insightful are the unarticulated or unspoken attributes (Figure 1: top left
quadrant). These attributes are unique in that they can provide employers with
an opportunity to delight recruits and employees and further the organization s
competitive positioning for the best talent.
Two of the top five unspoken motivators relate to creativity and innovation.
America s economic future may rest on the ability to innovate, and if workers under-
stand how brainstorming and other creative-thinking sessions can contribute to
the organization s bottom line, they will feel their input is valued. Other unspoken
motivators relate to the organization itself and its leadership. Employees desire
to work for a leader with vision and an organization reflecting their (employees )
values, aspirations and beliefs. These unspoken motivators have a low-stated
importance according to employees but a high-derived importance, which means
they don t stand out as critically important in the employee s mind, but efforts to
improve these will greatly affect attraction and retention.
Second Quarter 2009 43
Minimum Requirements
R ESOURCES PLUS
The expected or minimum require-
For more information related to this paper:
ment s (Fig ure 1: bot tom r ight
www.worldatwork.org
quadrant) have a high-stated impor-
Type in any or all of the following keywords
or phrases on the search line:
tance and low-derived importance.
E mployee engagement
Feedback from surveyed employees
R etain top talent
indicates these minimum require-
G enerational differences.
ments are important, but they do
not increase loyalty. The minimum
w ww.worldatwork.org/bookstore
Workforce Engagement Strategies requirements quadrant in which
to Attract, Motivate and Retain Talent
fair compensation, good benefits
E mployee Engagement Fundamentals
and generous paid time off fall
A Guide for Managers and Supervisors
can best be described as cost of
B attling to Be the Best Why Companies
Compete for Best-Place-to-Work Lists.
entry attributes. However, it is the
authors experience, and it is impor-
www.worldatwork.org/education
tant to note, that failing to meet these
T1: Total Rewards Management
Certification Course minimum requirements will result in
W4: Organizational Culture Change
lower initial attractiveness and greater
A Work-Life Perspective, Certification Course
loss of employees over time.
T4: Strategic Communication in
The final quadrant is the low-
Total Rewards, Certification Course.
yield attributes (Figure 1: bottom left
quadrant), which have low-stated
importance and low-derived importance. They are not good indicators of employee
loyalty, and resources focused on these attributes are ultimately wasted.
T HE GENERATIONAL DIFFERENCE: KEY DRIVERS
Unlike any time in U.S. history, four generations are in the workforce at the same
time, each with distinguishing characteristics.
For the purpose of the author s study the three dominant generations by size
are included. The fourth generation, the Matures, is a relatively small percent of
the workforce and not statistically viable for the survey s purpose. The generations
in the workforce are as follows:
Generation Y (also called Millennials ) (74 million are less than 30 years of age)
Generation X (slightly less than 50 million are between 30 and 45 years
of age)
Baby Boomers (76 million workers are between 46 and 64 years of age).
Many managers, consultants and researchers feel that this generational difference
is significant and plays an important factor in employee engagement. For example,
Berkshire Associates (2008) noted:
Outside your office door, everything may appear fine, but tension may
be brewing among your Baby Boomer, Generation X and Generation Y
workforces. How can managers and HR work together to optimize each
44 WorldatWork Journal
group s strengths while creating a productive and satisfying environment
for all three styles?
The core of this tension originates from differing work values and
perceptions of relationship with employers.
Understanding the differences between these three groups will allow
you to effectively use their experiences and diverse views. It s your job to
figure out how you can best build your environment to balance the needs
of cross-generational workers in your company.
The generational consideration is one that is somewhat controversial.
Author Frank Giancola wrote recently (2008):
The generational approach has many serious weaknesses. First, academics
believe that two of its main premises lack support and that the Cohort
Generation is not worthy of serious study. Second, there is disagreement
among experts over the birth periods and number of generations, making
defining a generation a problematic task. Third, people born near the start
or end of a generation exhibit characteristics of two generations. Fourth,
the Baby Boom generation is long enough to cover parents and their
children. Fifth, research shows that the most valued and defining rewards
of some generations are valued equally or higher by others. Finally, recent
research shows that generational conflict at work has been exaggerated.
These weaknesses make the Cohort Generation a challenging concept
for HR professionals and provide a valid rationale to focus on other talent
strategies. The best advice comes from Gallup: Organizations need to
understand employees as individuals to determine whether they share the
same interests and values as the organization. Intensive candidate interviews
and employee surveys are needed to gain this knowledge. HR programs
based on the deeply flawed generational approach increase the chances
of suboptimal organizational performance and wasted resources.
(A Cohort Generation is a group of people who experience the same historical
events at about the same age.)
In addition, a study by Sirota Survey Intelligence indicates that the generational
employee engagement differences are small (WorldatWork 2008a).
The authors, however, believe that the differences are strong and that the genera-
tional differences are important to consider in attracting, motivating and retaining
employees. IMR Research Group s survey results are presented here.
Millennial Motivators
As employers get to know the latest generation to join their ranks, they are thirsty for
information on how to attract, retain, manage and maintain loyalty from this genera-
tion. Figure 2 on page 46 presents the key drivers motivating this generation.
Particular to this generation is working for an organization with open commu-
nication across organizational levels. Millennials are highly motivated by bosses
Second Quarter 2009 45
who help them understand how they
FIGURE 2 Millennial Generation Key Drivers
fit into the larger picture to under-
O pen communication across all levels
stand why they are being asked to
I nfluence on goals/strategy related to job
do what they do, which begins with
N ew ideas encouraged and tried out
H igh level of trust between management open communication. The Millennial
and employees
generation is the first to be included
Passionate and motivated employees
in its own family budget discussions,
C reativity and independent thinking valued
so members are accustomed to a seat
at the table. Organizations leveraging
this attribute will find ways to allow
this generation to influence goals
and strategies as they relate to their job and allow this generation to share new
ideas and try them out. Millennials value their creativity and independent thinking,
and though they are looking for direction and guidance, they want to be valued
for what they bring to the table.
Generation X Motivators
FIGURE 3 Generation X Key Drivers
As the Baby Boomers begin to retire,
Fair compensation for the job asked to do
the business world will rely heavily
Passionate and motivated employees
on Generation X to lead organiza-
H igh level of trust between management
tions. Figure 3 presents the key drivers
and employees
motivating members of Generation X.
O pportunities for learning
Professional development is encouraged Gen Xers coined the term life-
R ecognizes/rewards excellent performance long learners, thus opportunities
E mpowered to use own judgment
for learning and the encouragement
I nfluence over goals/strategy related to job
of professional development are
uniquely important to this generation.
This generation is at midcareer, and
as members continue to climb the
corporate ladder, receiving fair compensation for the job they are asked to do is an
important key driver. They also need to feel trusted and empowered to use their own
judgment and influence their goals and strategies, especially when leading teams.
Baby Boomer Motivators
Millions of Baby Boomers will pass retirement age in the next 10 years, but with
the financial hit many retirement funds have taken recently, this generation may
not be in a hurry to retire. However, the decision to keep working is not solely
based on financial reasons. In addition, Boomers are becoming known as the
sandwich generation as they deal with aging parents and growing children, many
of whom return home after graduating college or never leave. With new stress and
pressure on their time, members of this generation will be looking for balance
in their work and personal lives.
46 WorldatWork Journal
It is easy to deduct from the key FIGURE 4 Baby Boomer Key Drivers
drivers motivating this generation R ecognizes/rewards excellent performance
that they want to influence job H igh level of trust between management
and employees
goals (they want their experience
C reativity and independent thinking valued
recognized and respected), to be
N ew ideas encouraged and tried out
able to try new ideas, to have their
I ndividual and team successes celebrated
creativity and independent thinking
E mpowered to use own judgment
valued and to be empowered to use I nfluence on goals/strategy related to job
their own judgment. And unlike the
Millennials and Generation X, the
Boomers expect that individual and
team successes will be celebrated,
which is in line with their leadership style of leading by consensus and having a
team perspective. Figure 4 represents key drivers for Baby Boomers
CONCLUSION
Employee engagement directly impacts profitability, and organizations are wasting
resources human and financial unless the focus is on policies and practices
that are going to provide the best return on investment in helping to attract as
well as retain talent. Organizations must figure out how best to retain their top
talent to be well positioned for an economic resurgence. Understanding what
drives employee motivation and loyalty is key to the sustainability and growth
of an organization.
AUTHOR
Stacey Randall i s the founder and chief consultant of SBR Consulting LLC and is the workplace futurist for IMR
Research Group Inc. As an employee retention specialist, she works as a generational consultant and leads
IMR s proprietary work-life attraction and retention scorecard for companies and city groups across the United
States. She can be reached at ********@***********.***.
R EFERENCES
Corporate Executive Board. 2008. E xecutive Guidance for 2009. h ttp://www.executiveboard.com/2009guidance/
pdf/Exec_Guidance_TC_Web.pdf. Viewed: Jan. 15, 2009.
Branham, Leigh. 2005. T he Seven Hidden Reasons Employees Leave.
Berkshire Associates. 2008. T he Generation Factor Understanding how differences in generations affect
your workforce. w ww.berkshireassociates.com/infocenter/whitepapers.aspx. Viewed: Feb. 25, 2009.
Giancola, Frank. 2008. Is the Generation Gap a Bogus Issue? workspan, N ovember: 23.
IMR Research Group Inc. 2008. Work/life Survey: Attraction & Retention Scorecard.
Taylor, Craig. 2004. Retention Leadership, T&D, M arch.
WorldatWork. 2008. Organizations Are Failing to Create Trust Internally. Newsline: Aug. 21. http://
www.worldatwork.org/waw/adimComment?id=28005. Viewed: Feb. 25, 2009.
WorldatWork. 2008a. Employee Engagement Differences Across Generations Relatively Small. Newsline:
April 3. http://www.worldatwork.org/waw/adimLink?id=25544Viewed: Feb. 25, 2009.
Second Quarter 2009 47