INTEGRATING MULTI-SOURCE INFORMATION VIA FUZZY CLASSIFICATION
METHOD FOR WETLAND GRASS MAPPING
X. Zhao a b, X. Chen a c *, A. Stein b
a
State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University,
Luo Yu road 129, China - ***@*****.***.***.**
b
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, Hengelosestraat 99, Enschede,
Netherlands (xzhao,stein)@itc.nl
c
The Key Lab of Poyang Lake Ecological Environment and Resource Development, Jiangxi Normal University,
Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
Ths-17 Geo-information contribution to sustainability indicators
KEY WORDS: Indicator System, Geo-information, Remote Sensing, Monitoring, Synthesis Analysis
ABSTRACT:
Late greening vegetation has been regarded as significant indicator of flood recessional wetlands ecosystem in the Poyang lake
natural reserve (PLNNR). Mapping the wetlands, especially the distribution of late greening grassland is of great importance for
PLNNR managers and decision makers either for ecosystem dynamic monitoring or habitat sustainability assessment. The aim of
this paper is to explore the use of fuzzy classification methods to map wetlands land cover and to better represent the vegetation
landscape. The proposed fuzzy rule-based system integrates information on NDVI, wetness and elevation and expert knowledge
about vegetation growth condition and phenology. Nine types of land covers were classified, with four belonging to wetland
vegetation. A traditional error matrix analysis has been used for accuracy assessment. The results show that fuzzy classification
provides more detailed information on the possibility of vegetation presence, rather than presence/absence information obtained
from a crisp classification. Fuzzy classification thus best represents vague objects and is less sensitive to poor data quality.
classify early and late greening grassland(Tan 2002; Si 2006;
1. INTRODUCTION
Zeng 2006). Due to vague boundaries and highly heterogeneous
The seasonal dynamic pattern of wetlands ecosystem within of wetland grasslands, conventional crisp classification methods
Poyang Lake National Nature Reserve (PLNNR) is influenced lack capability of providing satisfactory accuracy. Fuzzy
by climate (rain fall, temperature and solar radiation), classifiers based on the concept of the fuzzy theory (Zadeh
environmental conditions (soil moisture, terrain), and 1965), are able to better deal with imprecise, uncertain or
hydrological fluctuation of the five up-rivers and the Yangtze ambiguous data sets and knowledge, than crisp classifiers.
River. Every year, various wetland vegetation areas green up in
spring. Some remain green throughout the summer flooding Fuzzy logic and fuzzy set theory have been applied in a variety
months (June to August), but become senescent in autumn of ecological mapping and prediction applications. Application
(September to November). We call these early greening examples include: fuzzy modelling of vegetation dynamics
grassland. Other wetland vegetation submerges during the (Foody 1996; Hajj et al. 2007), eutrophication in a lake (Chen
flooding period in dormancy, but starts to germinate at the end and Mynett 2003) and soil landscapes (McBratney and Odeh
of September when flood water ebbs and soil is exposed 1997; Bruin and Stein 1998; Metternicht 2003).
gradually. We call these late greening grassland. Late greening
grassland provides habitats that are popular among migrating The aim of this paper is to explore the use of fuzzy
birds in autumn. The growth of late greening grassland is classification to map wetlands land cover and to best represent
sensitive to the recession onset, which later influences forage by the vague vegetation landscape in the PLNNR. More
the migrating birds. It has thus been regarded as a significant specifically, we use fuzzy inference to recognize vague patterns
indicator of this flood recessional wetlands ecosystem(Liu and in a set of spatial data derived from Landsat TM image and an
Xu 1994). Therefore, mapping the wetlands, especially late elevation model. We argue that fuzzy inference, in combination
greening grassland distribution is of great importance for with multi-source information, preserves the vague nature of the
PLNNR managers and decision makers either for ecosystem physical wetlands vegetation landscape in the final mapping
dynamic monitoring or habitat sustainability assessment. result.
The grass wetland within PLNNR is dynamic, but its extent and 2. METHOD
presence are vague in space. Different vegetation communities
Fuzzy classification in spatial applications uses multi-source
are distributed in discernible ring belts around lake areas from
information. For example, it may include expert knowledge,
low to higher elevations (Tan 2002; Wu and Ji 2002). Previous
DEMs and remotely sensed image. We apply Mamdani's fuzzy
studies on this area combined multi-source information, to best
* Corresponding author. This is useful to know for communication with the appropriate person in cases with more than one author.
1463
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B7. Beijing 2008
inference system to map the wetlands land covers in the 2.2 Fuzzy sets, membership function and inference system
PLNNR. A brief review of the definition of fuzzy set,
Fuzzy set theory has been applied in various fields, such as
membership function and fuzzy inference system is given first,
image clustering (Binaghi et al. 1999), decision making and
which is followed by a fuzzy rule-based system applied to the
control. Basic definitions of fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic can be
land cover classification in the study area.
found in(McBratney and Odeh 1997; Fisher 2000). A fuzzy set
A is characterised by a membership function (MF), A(x), that
2.1 Study Area and data sets
assigns to each element x a grade of membership ranging from
The study area - Poyang Lake National Natural Reserve zero to one.
(PLNNR) is approximately 240 km2 (29 05 - 29 18 N,
[0,1]
X
A = {x, A(x)} for each x A(x) (3)
115 53 -116 10 E). The area is located to the northwest
of the Poyang Lake in the JiangXi province, central China. It is
A(x) = 0 means that x does not belong to the subset A, A(x) =
situated within the middle range of the Yangtze River basin.
1 indicates that x fully belongs, and 0 65%}, and compare it with field samples, then we
Figure 5 shows the nine land cover distribution within the
observe a 74.55% overall accuracy and a kappa value of 0.48
PLNNR area, based on the fuzzy rule-based classification of the
Landsat TM image and DEM and expert knowledge on the
3.2 Uncertainty map and analysis
phenology of wetland vegetation. Pixels excluded by the 19
rules were assigned to unclassified. The membership values
A fuzzy classification has the advantage that a measure of
from all the land covers were compared and the class with the
uncertainty factor C can be defined for each pixel as
highest membership value was assigned to the pixel label. The
accuracy assessment for all the 9 classified land covers shows a
C = 1 max m(x) (4)
71.69% overall accuracy and kappa value equal to 0.68 (table 1).
This wetlands land cover map provides more detail location
This measure indicates whether or not the classification has
information on different wetland vegetations than previous
yielded a clear response. The highest value of uncertainty factor
studies (Zheng 2001; Zhao et al. 2003; Si 2006; Leeuw et al.
is 0.5, which indicates the unclassified pixels. The lowest
2007). Dominant wetland vegetation including late greening
occurring value equals 0.11 instead of zero, since membership
vegetation, early greening vegetation and aquatic vegetation
value of each output has not successfully captured 1. The
were differentiated from terrain vegetation. Moreover,
reason is that centroid operator was used for defuzzification of
germinant late greening vegetations which still do not appear
the system output. It confines the range of vigorous late
blooming in October and wet bare lands which have suitable
greening vegetation value from 0.89 to 0.1 and the range of
wetness condition for late greening vegetation shooting up have
other land covers value from 0.75 to 0.25. Membership values
been detected.
outside this range are impossible to be reproduced by fuzzy
inference. The system output variables were divided into four or
From the classification result, we notice that 108 plots have
two categories. The number of divisions has an impact on the
been classified as early greening vegetation, among which only
possible range of output values. A fine divisions corresponds
55 were correct, leading to 50.93% users accuracy. Since early
with a large range of output membership values. Considering all
greening vegetation grows in a wide range of elevations and
uncertainty factors, we considered pixels with C 0.35 as having a high
misclassified to it. Obvious misclassification happened
potentiality of misclassification. The uncertainty map in figure
between vigorous late greening vegetation and early greening
7 thus provides us with a good opportunity to highlight the
vegetation. The suitable growth elevation of early greening
deficiencies in the rule-based system and can be referenced as
vegetation ranges wider than that for late greening vegetation.
priori sampling locations for validation.
Therefore, they have distinct phenology but still are highly
mixed at the moderate elevation level. In Miscanthus +
Cynodon + Carex vegetation community, for instance, taller
Miscanthus and Cynodon grows in the superstratum and Carex
is the undergrowth (Wu and Ji 2002). Some germinant late
greening vegetation was misclassified as early greening
vegetation. The reasons are that they have similar NDVI values
of image pixels which reflect both of them appearing less
vigorous in the fields, and that they possibly mix in their growth
in lower elevation near the shortly exposed river bank. Some
terrestrial vegetation was misclassified as early greening
vegetation mainly due to the similar spectral characteristics and
suitable elevation of crop fields and early greening vegetation.
River bank area and wet bare land near the river both have a
low NDVI and a low elevation. They only differ in wetness
degree. Sample plots of river bank and wet bare land collected
from Landsat TM image are imprecise by nature, thus
underestimating the accuracy of the assessments on these two
classes.
1466
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B7. Beijing 2008
Fig. 5. Wetland land cover map classified by fuzzy rule-based system
Reference
CT NC PA UA
Class Class Class Class Class Class Class Class Class
Classified
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
57 *-**-*-*-*-*-*-*-** 57 62.64% 67.86%
Class 1
**-**-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-** 55 66.27% 67.90%
Class 2
**-**-**-*-*-*-*-** 0 108 55 73.33% 50.93%
Class 3
3 4 *-**-*-*-*-*-*-**-** 57.33% 86.00%
Class 4
1 2 1 *-**-*-**-*-*-**-** 56.63% 68.12%
Class 5
2 0 2 6 *-**-*-*-*-**-** 77.19% 72.13%
Class 6
0 1 0 *-**-*-**-*-*-**-** 71.43% 67.16%
Class 7
0 0 1 0 0 6 0 68 0 75 68 79.07% 90.67%
Class 8
0 0 1 8 8 0 1 0 90 108 90 100.00% 83.33%
Class 9
Reference
**-**-**-**-**-** 63-86-90-703-***
Total
Overall Classification Accuracy = 71.69%
Overall Kappa Statistics = 0.6809
Table 1. Wetlands land cover map accuracy report (RT= reference total, CT= classified total, NC= number correct, PA= producers
accuracy, UA= users accuracy)
1467
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B7. Beijing 2008
Fig. 6. Membership values of possibility of vigorous late Fig. 7. Locations of pixels with high uncertainty (in black)
greening vegetation presence
1.20 300
Proportion of late greening
y = 125.31x + 98.216
1.00 250
R2 = 0.7771
0.80 200
vegetation
NDVI
0.60 150
0.40 100
0.20 50
0.00 0
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Mem bership value Mem bership value
Fig. 8. Correlation between membership values and vegetation proportions (a), membership values and normalised NDVI values (b)
membership values can be regarded to corresponding vegetation
4. DISCUSSION
proportion in the fields. In fact, output membership functions
describe possibility instead of proportion. A total of 109 field
4.1 Validation of soft classification result
sample plots with late greening vegetation proportion higher
Soft classification approaches based on fuzzy set theory or than 50% has been used to extract membership values on soft
probability statistic theory are expected to give more result map in figure 6. Figure 8(a) shows that the correlation
information than only yes or no by hard classification. How to between membership values and vegetation proportion is not
evaluate the soft classification result, however, has been significant. In the absence of a directly corresponding test
proposed as a research and practical question(Gopal and measurement, validation of the soft result becomes difficult. In
Woodcock 1994; Foody 1996; Binaghi et al. 1999; Townsend figure 8 (b), membership values and normalised NDVI values
2000). When using historical images and field collected data, as appear highly positively correlated. It shows that NDVI values
in this study, validation will be confined by the existing data can serve as indicator of late greening vegetation presence.
and soft results can not be fully assessed. Even if there is an Possibility values in figure 6, however, contain more
opportunity to collect test samples in the fields for a particular comprehensive information about vegetation presence than the
soft classification validation, we may question what kind of NDVI values, since it not only considers vegetation index
information in the sample point will correspond to the soft (NDVI) but also the wetness index (LSWI) and elevation. In
result. In this study, taking the vigorous late greening summary, it is no problem to compare different possibility
vegetation output as an example, membership functions to map values and to select the land cover with maximum one as
possibility degree of vegetation presence have values between classification label, but to use the single soft result of one land
cover deserves more attention.
0 and 1. Membership values close to 1 indicate high possibility
to present, those close to 0 indicate high possibility of absence, 4.2 Limitations and further improvement
and those around 0.5 indicate highly uncertain decisions. The From the low users accuracy of early greening vegetation, we
uncertainty map in figure 6 thus gives a rough impression notice that fuzzy rule-based system works less efficiently if the
where high certainty happens, i.e. in the homogeneous classification object has loose constraints, as may apply for
vegetation zones, and where large uncertainty occurs, i.e. in widely distributed vegetation without growth limits,. Part of the
vegetation transition zones. This does not necessarily mean that
1468
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B7. Beijing 2008
Boles, S., X. Xiao, et al., 2004. Land cover characterization of
classification error can be corrected by an image from another
Temperate East Asia using multi-temporal image data of
time. For example, in the late November image, early greening
VEGETATION sensor. Remote Sensing of Environment. 90, pp.
vegetation and germinant late greening vegetation can be
477-489.
classified with more certainty, when most of early greening
vegetation withered versus germinant late greening vegetations
blooming. The fuzzy rule-based system is flexible to add the Bruin, S. d. and A. Stein, 1998. Soil-landscape modelling using
multi-temporal image data, only at the price of additional fuzzy c-means clustering of attribute data derived from a digital
computing time. elevation model (DEM). Geoderma. 83, pp. 17-33.
The rules in the fuzzy rule-based system are based on expert Chen, Q. and A. E. Mynett, 2003. Integration of data mining
knowledge on the vegetation growth conditions and phenology. techniques and heuristic knowledge in fuzzy logic modelling of
Therefore, mapping natural land covers can benefit from the eutrophication in Taihu lake. Ecological Modelling. 162, pp.
extra information besides the image data. If existing knowledge 55-67.
about the classification targets is insufficient or implicated in
the data, the explicit rules definition used in this study can not Fisher, P., 2000. Sorites paradox and vague geographies. Fuzzy
applied any more. In addition, if the number of system inputs is Sets and Systems. 113, pp. 7-18.
large, there is no possibility to try out each possible inputs
combination. Other data mining methods, such as neural
Foody, G. M., 1996. Approaches for the production and
networks and optimizing methods such as simulating annealing
evaluation of fuzzy land cover classifications from remotely-
can be the alternatives for rules construction (Zheng 2001;
sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 17(7), pp.
Bardossy and Samaniego 2002).
1317-1340.
The fuzzy rule-based classification in this study is an
Foody, G. M., 1996. Fuzzy modelling of vegetation from
unsupervised classification. It integrates expert knowledge and
remotely sensed imagery. Ecological Modelling. 85, pp. 3-12.
multi-source data by means of fuzzy inference. Other
researches on precise membership function definition (Vlag and
Gopal, S. and C. Woodcock, 1994. Theory and methods for
Stein 2007) and rule importance measurement (Zheng 2001)
accuracy assessment of thematic maps using fuzzy sets.
can provide further improvements on this classification method.
Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 60(2), pp.
If more samples exist for supervised classification, the
181-188.
possibility values given to each land cover can be used as priori
probability instead of equal probability value in maximum
Hajj, M. E., A. Begue, et al., 2007. Multi-source Information
likelihood classification approach.
Fusion: Monitoring Sugarcane Harvest Using Multi-temporal
Images, Crop Growth Modelling, and Expert Knowledge. in
International Workshop on the Analysis of Multi-Temporal
5. CONCLUSION
Remote Sensing Images. Leuven, Belgium: IEEE.
Wetland ecosystem is characterised by high dimensionality,
complexity and non-linearity. Ecosystem knowledge is usually Hunt, E. R., 1994. Relationship between woody biomass and
semi-qualitative, and a large field dataset is difficult to obtain PAR conversion efficiency for estimating net primary
due to high sampling cost and inaccessible plots. This makes production from NDVI. International Journal of Remote
classification approaches solely depending upon expert Sensing. 15(8), pp. 1725-1730.
experiences rather subjective and let alone purely data-driven
approaches such as artificial neural network. The fuzzy rule- J. A.Gamon, C.B.Field, et al., 1995. Relationship between
based system applied in this study is a practical approach to NDVI, canopy structure, and photosynthesis in three
deal with semi-qualitative knowledge and semi-qualitative data. Califormian vegetation types. Ecological Applications. 5(1), pp.
This research shows that land cover mapping in the PLNNR 28-41.
wetland ecosystem can benefit from a fuzzy rule-based
classification method by combining expert knowledge, DEM,
Leeuw, J. d., Y. Si, et al., 2007. Mapping flood recessional
and remotely sensed image. This method provides more detail
grasslands used by overwintering geese: a multi-temporal
information on possibility rather than only presence or absence
remote sensing application. in 5th spatial data quality
information in a crisp classification. It has the powerful
international symposium Enschede, the Netherlands.
capability of representing vague objects and is less sensitive to
data quality problems.
Liu, Y. and Y. Xu, 1994. The study of influence and
countermeasure of Sanxia project to Poyang Lake's migratory
birds reserve Journal of JangXi Normal University. 18(4), pp.
REFERENCES
375-380.
Bardossy, A. and L. Samaniego, 2002. Fuzzy rule-based
McBratney, A. B. and I. O. A. Odeh, 1997. Application of
classification of remotely sensed imagery. IEEE Transaction on
fuzzy sets in soil science: fuzzy logic, fuzzy measures and
Geoscience and Remote Sensing 40(2), pp. 362-374.
fuzzy decisions. Geoderma. 77, pp. 85-113.
Binaghi, E., P. A. Brivio, et al., 1999. A fuzzy set-based
Metternicht, G. I., 2003. Categorical fuzziness: a comparision
accuracy assessment of soft classification. Pattern Recognition
between crisp and fuzzy class boundary modeling for mapping
Letters. 20, pp. 935-948.
salt-affected soils using Landsat TM data and a classification
based on anion ratios. Ecological Modelling. 168, pp. 371-389.
1469
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B7. Beijing 2008
Zeng, Y., 2006.Monitoring grassland in Poyang Natural
Si, Y., 2006.Mapping flood recessional grasslands grazed by
Reserve, China. MSc, Enschede, ITC, pp. 54.
overwintering geese: an application of multi-temporal remote
sensing. MSc, Enschede, ITC, pp. 60.
Zhao, X., M. Yuan, et al., 2003. A Study on Remote Sensing
Investigation and Comprehensive Utilization of Low-grassland
Tan, Q., 2002.Study on remote sensing change detection and its
in Poyang Lake Region. Journal of JangXi Normal University.
application to Poyang international importance wetland. PhD,
(1).
Beijing, Institute of Remote Sensing Application Chinese
Academy of Science, pp. 136.
Zheng, D., 2001.A Neuro-fuzzy approach to linguistic
knowledge acquisition and assessment in spatial decision
Townsend, P. A., 2000. A quantitative fuzzy approach to assess
making. Vechta, Germany, Vechta, pp. 156.
mapped vegetation classifications for ecological applications.
Remote Sensing of Environment. 72, pp. 253-267.
Vlag, D. E. v. d. and A. Stein, 2007. Incorporating uncertainty ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
via hierarchical classification using fuzzy decision trees. IEEE
This work was funded by the 973 Program (Grant
Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 45(1), pp.
No.2006CB701300), Sino-Germany Joint Project (Grant No.
237-245.
2006DFB91920), Open Fund of Shanghai Leading Academic
Discipline Project (T0102) and Key project of LIESMARS
Wu, Y. and W. Ji, 2002.Study on Jiangxi Poyang Lake National
(2006).
Nature Reserve.
Zadeh, L. A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 8, pp.
338-353.
1470