Post Job Free
Sign in

It Manager

Location:
United States
Posted:
October 16, 2012

Contact this candidate

Resume:

FAQ Today's Posts Search

" Video Reviews

" Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.

" Sponsor

" Partners

" Sponsor

Linux Archive > Ubuntu > Ubuntu Kernel Team

List of kernel bugs tagged suspend, resume, or hibernate

Search Forums

Show Threads Show Posts

Advanced Search

Go to Page...

LinkBack Thread Tools

01-12-2009, 08:56 PM

Leann Ogasawara

List of kernel bugs tagged suspend, resume, or hibernate

Hi All,

I've thrown together a list of kernel bugs currently tagged either

"suspend", "resume", or "hibernate" in Launchpad.

http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ogasawara/suspend-resume.html

Hopefully it will help isolate some of the issues we see this cycle. I

do anticipate the list to grow since I have a long list of potential

suspend/resume/hibernate bugs that I still need to go through and tag.

Let me know if you want to see any additional tags displayed or maybe a

combination of the above tags e.g. bugs tagged both "suspend" and

"resume". Also, if there is any additional information you want shown

in each table, let me know and I'll see if it's possible to gather it

via the launchpadlib api.

Thanks,

Leann

--

kernel-team mailing list

******-****@*****.******.***

https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team

01-12-2009, 09:01 PM

Pete Graner

List of kernel bugs tagged suspend, resume, or hibernate

Leann Ogasawara wrote:

> Hi All,

>

> I've thrown together a list of kernel bugs currently tagged either

> "suspend", "resume", or "hibernate" in Launchpad.

>

> http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ogasawara/suspend-resume.html

>

> Hopefully it will help isolate some of the issues we see this cycle. I

> do anticipate the list to grow since I have a long list of potential

> suspend/resume/hibernate bugs that I still need to go through and tag.

> Let me know if you want to see any additional tags displayed or maybe a

> combination of the above tags e.g. bugs tagged both "suspend" and

> "resume". Also, if there is any additional information you want shown

> in each table, let me know and I'll see if it's possible to gather it

> via the launchpadlib api.

>

> Thanks,

> Leann

>

>

Thanks Leann. One question, these are obviously on releases prior to

Jaunty, how do we differentiate them from the ones found in Jaunty? Do

we need to run thru them all and ask them to retest on Jaunty Alpha 3?

Given the new test frame work in Alpha 3, it would be nice to somehow

which ones came from where i.e. the test script or user experience. make

sense?

~pete

--

Pete Graner

Manager

Ubuntu Kernel Team

Canonical Ltd. http://www.canonical.com/

--

kernel-team mailing list

******-****@*****.******.***

https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team

01-12-2009, 09:35 PM

Leann Ogasawara

List of kernel bugs tagged suspend, resume, or hibernate

On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 17:01 -0500, Pete Graner wrote:

> Leann Ogasawara wrote:

> > Hi All,

> >

> > I've thrown together a list of kernel bugs currently tagged either

> > "suspend", "resume", or "hibernate" in Launchpad.

> >

> > http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ogasawara/suspend-resume.html

> >

> > Hopefully it will help isolate some of the issues we see this cycle. I

> > do anticipate the list to grow since I have a long list of potential

> > suspend/resume/hibernate bugs that I still need to go through and tag.

> > Let me know if you want to see any additional tags displayed or maybe a

> > combination of the above tags e.g. bugs tagged both "suspend" and

> > "resume". Also, if there is any additional information you want shown

> > in each table, let me know and I'll see if it's possible to gather it

> > via the launchpadlib api.

> >

> > Thanks,

> > Leann

> >

> >

>

> Thanks Leann. One question, these are obviously on releases prior to

> Jaunty, how do we differentiate them from the ones found in Jaunty?

I can go through and get them tagged according to their release so it's

easy to differentiate them. I can then easily display this in the table

as well.

> Do we need to run thru them all and ask them to retest on Jaunty Alpha 3?

I think this would actually be a good idea to do for any

suspend/hibernate bug that is currently open. I could easily script up

an automated call for testing.

> Given the new test frame work in Alpha 3, it would be nice to somehow

> which ones came from where i.e. the test script or user experience. make

> sense?

I assume the bugs that will get reported via the test script (apport)

will also be tagged something like "apport-bug". Steve, can you comment

if the tagging I'm expecting to happen here is a valid assumption? This

will make it easy to then distinguish those bugs reported via the script

vs manually reported from a user. I could then also easily showcase

this in the bug list display.

Thanks,

Leann

--

kernel-team mailing list

******-****@*****.******.***

https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team

01-13-2009, 03:34 AM

Steve Conklin

List of kernel bugs tagged suspend, resume, or hibernate

On 01/12/2009 04:35 PM, Leann Ogasawara wrote:

> I assume the bugs that will get reported via the test script (apport)

> will also be tagged something like "apport-bug". Steve, can you comment

> if the tagging I'm expecting to happen here is a valid assumption? This

> will make it easy to then distinguish those bugs reported via the script

> vs manually reported from a user. I could then also easily showcase

> this in the bug list display.

As it stands now, all suspend/resume bugs files by the apport automatic

detection will be tagged with all of the following: "suspend", "resume",

"hiberate", and "apport-kerneloops" (not sure of the exact spelling of

the last one). This can all be changed if desired, the tags are

hard-coded in the script.

Steve

--

kernel-team mailing list

******-****@*****.******.***

https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team

01-13-2009, 04:09 PM

Leann Ogasawara

List of kernel bugs tagged suspend, resume, or hibernate

On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 22:34 -0600, Steve Conklin wrote:

> On 01/12/2009 04:35 PM, Leann Ogasawara wrote:

> > I assume the bugs that will get reported via the test script (apport)

> > will also be tagged something like "apport-bug". Steve, can you comment

> > if the tagging I'm expecting to happen here is a valid assumption? This

> > will make it easy to then distinguish those bugs reported via the script

> > vs manually reported from a user. I could then also easily showcase

> > this in the bug list display.

>

> As it stands now, all suspend/resume bugs files by the apport automatic

> detection will be tagged with all of the following: "suspend", "resume",

> "hiberate", and "apport-kerneloops" (not sure of the exact spelling of

> the last one). This can all be changed if desired, the tags are

> hard-coded in the script.

I'd prefer the use of "apport-bug" vs. "apport-kerneloops".

"apport-kerneloops" implies an actual Oops was detected and is being

reported.

Thanks,

Leann

--

kernel-team mailing list

******-****@*****.******.***

https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team

01-14-2009, 02:45 PM

Andy Whitcroft

List of kernel bugs tagged suspend, resume, or hibernate

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:09:46AM -0800, Leann Ogasawara wrote:

> On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 22:34 -0600, Steve Conklin wrote:

> > On 01/12/2009 04:35 PM, Leann Ogasawara wrote:

> > > I assume the bugs that will get reported via the test script (apport)

> > > will also be tagged something like "apport-bug". Steve, can you comment

> > > if the tagging I'm expecting to happen here is a valid assumption? This

> > > will make it easy to then distinguish those bugs reported via the script

> > > vs manually reported from a user. I could then also easily showcase

> > > this in the bug list display.

> >

> > As it stands now, all suspend/resume bugs files by the apport automatic

> > detection will be tagged with all of the following: "suspend", "resume",

> > "hiberate", and "apport-kerneloops" (not sure of the exact spelling of

> > the last one). This can all be changed if desired, the tags are

> > hard-coded in the script.

>

> I'd prefer the use of "apport-bug" vs. "apport-kerneloops".

> "apport-kerneloops" implies an actual Oops was detected and is being

> reported.

I think we might be stuck with whatever Steve put in his patches to

apport for the start of alpha-3, we are not likely to get apport changed

again before the release.

-apw

--

kernel-team mailing list

******-****@*****.******.***

https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team

01-14-2009, 08:10 PM

Steve Conklin

List of kernel bugs tagged suspend, resume, or hibernate

On 01/14/2009 09:45 AM, Andy Whitcroft wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:09:46AM -0800, Leann Ogasawara wrote:

>> On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 22:34 -0600, Steve Conklin wrote:

>>> On 01/12/2009 04:35 PM, Leann Ogasawara wrote:

I assume the bugs that will get reported via the test script (apport)

will also be tagged something like "apport-bug". Steve, can you comment

if the tagging I'm expecting to happen here is a valid assumption? This

will make it easy to then distinguish those bugs reported via the script

vs manually reported from a user. I could then also easily showcase

this in the bug list display.

>>> As it stands now, all suspend/resume bugs files by the apport automatic

>>> detection will be tagged with all of the following: "suspend", "resume",

>>> "hiberate", and "apport-kerneloops" (not sure of the exact spelling of

>>> the last one). This can all be changed if desired, the tags are

>>> hard-coded in the script.

>> I'd prefer the use of "apport-bug" vs. "apport-kerneloops".

>> "apport-kerneloops" implies an actual Oops was detected and is being

>> reported.

>

> I think we might be stuck with whatever Steve put in his patches to

> apport for the start of alpha-3, we are not likely to get apport changed

> again before the release.

>

> -apw

I couldn't get 'bug' to work when reporting against the kernel. I talked

with Martin Pitt about this, and there are a few options open to us,

just not in time for the alpha. The options we discussed are:

1. Tag it as a bug (apport-bug) against the pm-utils package

2. Create a new class of things to be reported by apport, just for

suspend/resume bugs.

Another problem with using kerneloops is that apport presents the user

with a message that says something like "you have experiences a kernel

crash", which is not really accurate.

Implementing (1) above is relatively easy, implementing (2) would allow

us to customize apport so that the user message is specific to

suspend/resume.

Martin is on holiday this week, he should be involved in any decisions

about this. This alpha release was a prototype, and we can improve it.

Steve

--

kernel-team mailing list

******-****@*****.******.***

https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team

Thread Tools

Show Printable Version

Email this Page

Thread Tools

Show Printable Version

Email this Page

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:41 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright c2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO c2007, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright c2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org

Contact Us - Linux Archive - Archive - Top -

LinkBack

LinkBack URL

About LinkBacks



Contact this candidate