Kenneth McDonough Pages * & *, Cover Letter
** ******* **** ***** * & 4, Resume
Bethpage, N.Y. 11714
Phone: 516-***-****
acgbg8@r.postjobfree.com
Dear Sir:
The purpose of this letter is to introduce you to a person who can readily meet the challenges of todays rapidly changing business
environment. I am currently searching for a position as a Equity Research Analyst, Equity Research Associate or Investment
Banking Associate. I would welcome the opportunity to become a member of your organization.
I can implement stockholder equity valuation models including dividend discount models, free cash flow valuation models,
residual income models, and financial models based on an earnings multiplier approach. My knowledge of the following equity
valuation models in use at leading investment banks is excellent: Cash Flow Return on Investment - CFROI (Credit Suisse),
Modelware (Morgan Stanley), the UBS Value Creation Analysis Model, and Economic Value Added. My knowledge of the use of
these company specific, proprietary equity valuation models is purely academic. I can implement any one of ten stockholder
equity valuation models. More recently, I have developed a significant number of equity valuation models using Excel. I can
utilize a number of third-party databases such as Bloomberg, IBES and Compustat. I have made a fundamental error by taking to
much time off from work while living on Long Island with my parents. However, no unfavorable events or adverse situations
have come to pass during this time period. To the contrary, I have actually enhanced my analytical skills and capabilities.
Equity analyst will generally benefit by developing a thorough knowledge of a company’s relative competitive position. I can
consider the impact of competitive strategy as an essential element in financial model development. Industry evolution is
important strategically because evolution, of course, brings with it changes in the structural sources of competition. I can focus on
the process of industry evolution including long-run changes in growth, changes in buyer segments served, scale economies, input
cost, and product, process and marketing innovation. Imbedded in the underlying technology, product characteristics, and nature
of present and potential buyers, an industry might evolve in a variety of ways. I can evaluate the overriding strategic issues
encountered during the growth phase of an industry’s development including technological and strategic uncertainty, high initial
cost, an absence of product or technological standardization, first time buyers, and erratic product quality. Every industry begins
with an initial structure, the entry barriers, buyer and supplier power, and so on which exist when the industry comes into
existence. This structure will usually differ from the configuration the industry will take later in its development. I can evaluate
some of the probable tendencies for a mature industry such as slow industry growth, more competition for market share, sales to
experienced, repeat buyers, new products and applications that are harder to come by, and a topping out problem in adding
capacity. Capacity expansion is one of the most significant strategic decisions faced by firms. It is probably the central strategic
issue in commodity-type businesses. The tendency towards overbuilding capacity is most severe when there are economies of
scale, changes in production technology, first mover advantages, a large number of firms, and inflated future expectations.
Competitive superiority is revealed as product differentiation along attributes that are important to consumers. I can explore how
different brands may be perceived to differ and on what dimensions. I can summarize how customers perceive competitor brands,
especially with respect to benefits provided, brand-customer relationships, and existing brand image. The most important assets of
a firm, such as the value of a brand, are intangible in that they are not capitalized and thus do not appear on the balance sheet. I
can evaluate brand equity, which can be significant in terms of shareholder value creation. The brand equity concept can be
usefully grouped into the following four categories: brand awareness, customer loyalty, perceived quality, and brand associations.
The awareness factor is particularly important. In the absence of a motivation to engage in product attribute evaluations, brand
awareness may be enough. I can evaluate brand loyalty, a key consideration when placing a value on a brand. A preference may
be based upon an association with a product attribute, customer benefit, use experience, or perception of product quality. A brand
association can influence the recall of information, differentiate the product, create positive attitudes, and provide a basis for
brand extensions. Product positioning will be based on a number of brand associations that serve to summarize a set of facts and
incidents about a brand into a smaller number of dimensions. In most product classes there are two, three, or four such
dimensions. I can consider the significance of these summary dimensions as well as other brand positioning concepts, for a more
robust assessment of shareholder value. I can evaluate customer trends, motivations, and segmentation structure. I can consider
prevailing market conditions, target market needs, existing brand images, and the role of the brand identity. A brand identity will
help to establish a relationship between the brand and the customer by generating a value proposition involving functional,
emotional or self-expressive benefits. I can evaluate the sources of product differentiation by considering the core, extended, and
augmented components of the product. I can profile a brand based on the most relevant perceptual dimensions, and how it may
differ from the profile of competitor brands. I can identify the target segments, specify the competitive set, and present and
interpret brand profiles. I can consider brand position, the attitudes towards a brand, brand strength, market demand, and
competitive intensity. I can focus on the role of brand management, a key consideration when placing a value on a brand.
Industry structural analysis should reflect the basic, underlying, and often dominant forces that may prevail in an industry. I can
present a general framework for analyzing the structure of an industry and its competitors. I can evaluate the impact of five
competitive forces that affect an industry including the rivalry among existing firms, the threat of new entrants, the bargaining
power of buyers, the bargaining power of suppliers, and the threat of substitute products. The collective strength of these five
competitive forces determines the ability of firms in an industry to earn, on average, rates of return in excess of the cost of capital.
Rivalry among existing competitors takes the familiar form of jockeying for position using tactics such as price competition,
advertising battles, new product introductions, and increased customer service. Intense rivalry within an industry is the result of a
number of interacting structural factors including the impact of numerous or equally balanced competitors, slow industry growth,
a lack of differentiation or switching cost, capacity added in large increments, high strategic stakes, and high exit barriers. Buyers
compete with an industry by forcing down prices, bargaining for higher quality or more services, and playing competitors against
each other, all at the expense of industry profitability. The power of each industry’s important buyer groups depends on a number
of characteristics. Buyers without much intrinsic bargaining power, because they are good buyers, will enable the firm to earn
high returns when they purchase small quantities relative to the sellers sales, seek custom made or differentiated varieties, or lack
qualified alternative sources. Good buyers will also face high shopping, transactions, or negotiating cost, will seek an effective
product that yields major savings or improvements in performance, or are poorly informed about the criteria on which alternative
brands should be evaluated. Competitive advantage stems from the discrete activities a firm performs in designing, producing,
marketing, and supporting its product. The significance of any strength a firm possesses is ultimately a function of its impact on
relative cost or differentiation, which represent the major sources of sustainable competitive advantage. The cost leadership and
differentiation strategies seek competitive advantage in a broad range of industry segments, while focus strategies aim at a cost
advantage or differentiation in a narrow segment of the market. The crucial question in determining profitability is not only the
satisfaction of buyer needs, but industry structure, reflecting the basic, underlying characteristics of an industry.
Although the traditional financial statements provide us with valuable insight concerning firm profitability and assets in place,
they are not organized for robust assessments of economic performance and value. The balance sheet mixes together operating
assets, nonoperating assets, and sources of financing. The income statement similarly combines operating profits with the cost of
financing, such as interest expense. To prepare the financial statements for the analysis of economic performance, I can reorganize
the items on the balance sheet, income statement, and statement of cash flows into three categories: operating, nonoperating, and
sources of financing. I can search through the footnotes to the financial statements to separate accounts that aggregate operating
and nonoperating items. I can utilize the reorganized financial statements to develop free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) and
economic-profit based valuation models. The economic-profit based valuation model is gaining in popularity because of its close
link to economic theory and competitive strategy. I can utilize Economic Value Added, an economic-profit based equity valuation
modeling approach. I can tackle the accounting adjustments that are necessary to estimate net operating profit after taxes
(NOPAT) and invested capital. I can make adjustments to NOPAT and invested capital including operating leases, goodwill
amortization, capitalized R&D, gains or losses on asset sales, and restructuring charges. I can quantify operating taxes with an
analysis of marginal tax rates and tax reconciliation tables provided in the footnotes to the financial statements. To determine
enterprise value, I can add to the value of core operations the value of nonoperating assets such as excess cash, marketable
securities, and nonconsolidated subsidiaries. To convert enterprise value to equity value, I can subtract short and long term debt,
debt equivalents such as unfunded pension liabilities, and other more hybrid securities such as convertible debt. I can develop
dividend discount models, free cash flow to the firm, free cash flow to equity, and residual income valuation models.
I can implement a top-down approach to firm valuation, beginning with a valuation of the aggregate market and progressing
through to an examination of various industries, to a consideration of an individual company and the valuation of its stock. I can
project the future value for the S&P 500 index and various industry indexes using a dividend discount valuation model, free cash
flow to equity (FCFE) valuation model, or financial models based on an earnings multiplier approach. I can project sales per share
and components of the S&P 500 profit margin including the impact of EBITDA, depreciation expense, interest expense, income
taxes, and net income per share. I can also project industry profit margins. After an analysis of the economy, structural forces, the
industry, the company, and its competitors, I can estimate the intrinsic value of a firm’s common stock. I can develop an
understanding of the alternative competitive strategies available, determine each firm’s strategy, judge whether the firm’s strategy
is reasonable for its industry, and finally, evaluate how successful the firm is in implementing its strategy. I can build residual
income valuation models. Residual income valuation models have the appealing focus of measuring the impact of the economic
structure in the markets for a company’s major products. In residual income valuation, a stock’s premium over book value is
considered a reflection of various economic scenarios including monopoly, oligopoly in which a few sellers compete with similar
or differentiated products, and finally the case of perfect competition. I can condense cash flow statement line items from a
company’s annual report into appropriate categories for use in the development of both (1) free cash flow to equity and (2) free
cash flow to the firm valuation models. I can utilize the capital asset pricing model (CAPM). For example, to estimate a
company’s beta, I can use an industry derived unlevered beta relevered to a company’s target capital structure. I can project price
multiples such as price to earnings, price to book, enterprise value to EBITDA, and price to cash flow. I can utilize technical
analysis and momentum indicators including stock price trends, EPS surprise, EPS momentum, and relative strength indicators.
Macroeconomic relationships offer valuable guidance and can provide useful performance measures on such topics as consumer,
business, and financial market behavior. I can participate in the collection, analysis, presentation and interpretation of economic
data. I can identify the various phases of the economic cycle including initial recovery, early upswing, late upswing, slowdown
and recession. I can evaluate the national income and product accounts (NIPA), which contain data for various components of
aggregate demand and income. I can evaluate the key components of aggregate demand, employment and unemployment,
productivity, and various measures of labor cost. I can analyze foreign exchange rates, industrial production, the rate of capacity
utilization, and interest rates. I can evaluate economic growth, based on trends such as population growth and demographics, and
business investment and productivity. I can analyze economic indicators including leading, coincident, and lagging indicators. I
can evaluate the principal sources of data on consumer spending such as retail sales, miscellaneous store sales data, and consumer
consumption data. I can evaluate monetary policy concerning interest rates and the money supply, and fiscal policy including
taxation and government spending. I can develop microeconomic decision models. I can model shifts in demand due to changing
buyer incomes and consumer taste, and shifts in supply due to changing input prices and technological innovation. I can model
optimal, profit-maximizing economic decision alternatives using Excel. Managerial decisions should be based on the notion of
economic profit, and I can develop equity valuation models that depend on the economic profit concept as well.
KENNETH MCDONOUGH
27 Beverly Road
Bethpage, N.Y. 11714
Phone: 516-***-****
Equity Research – My cover letter documents my venture into equity research. I am proficient in the development of stockholder
equity valuation models including dividend discount models, free cash flow valuation models, residual income models, and
Economic Value Added (EVA), an economic-profit based valuation approach. My knowledge of the following proprietary equity
valuation models is excellent: Cash Flow Return on Investment – CFROI (Credit Suisse), Modelware (Morgan Stanley), and the
UBS Value Creation Analysis Model. I can participate in the collection, analysis, presentation and interpretation of economic
data. I have become fairly expert at describing and assessing competitive strategy and the specific action steps required to gain a
competitive advantage. I can analyze competitive strategy, link it to competitive behavior, and evaluate strategic concepts as part
of the equity valuation process. See my cover letter for details.
BUSINESS EXPERIENCE:
METRO-NORTH, 347 Madison Avenue, New York, N.Y.
June 1984 – March 1988
Senior Financial Analyst – Participated in forecasting a complete set of financial statements including the income statement,
balance sheet, and statement of cash flows. Responsible for the analysis of sales growth trends and sales volatility. Participated in
the preparation of the sales forecast. Based sales projections primarily upon trends in historical data and management
expectations. Decomposed historical data into identifiable trends including cyclical or seasonal factors, and based projections
primarily on nonrandom trends and relationships. Participated in forecasting the income statement by preparing preliminary
forecast information including the reporting and analysis of actual expense trends in salaries and wages, and trends in manpower
reporting. Analyzed the magnitude of changes in operating expenses for the income statement forecast. Developed financial
models encompassing differential revenue and differential cost, discounted cash flow, and income projections based on
incremental service improvements. Participated in the preparation of the balance sheet forecast including an analysis of conditions
and events expected to produce changes in various balance sheet line items. Estimated the magnitude of changes in balance sheet
line items for the forecast. Analyzed comparative balance sheets and balance sheet trends as related to sales growth and the level
of company operations. Measured the impact of changing business conditions, significant trends and financing policies, and
capital investment programs for the balance sheet forecast. Measured the impact of debt financing plans in the balance sheet
forecast. Analyzed debt financing including the funding of future growth and capital investment programs. Participated in
forecasting future cash flows under various economic scenarios including changing sales volume and prices to assess the ability
of the firm to meet debt obligations. Participated in budgeting a complete set of financial statements.
BANKERS TRUST COMPANY, 130 Liberty Street, New York, N.Y.
May 1983 – June 1984
Management Information Systems Analyst – Responsible for various aspects of internal and external financial reporting and
operations systems. Projects included the reformatting of information by type and system to meet informational requirements.
Performed detailed analysis of banks Monthly Profitability System comparing controllers area accounting to departmental
reporting to assure consistent report line definition and information content.
AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC., 900 Old Country Road, Garden City, N.Y.
September 1979 – May 1983
Financial Analyst – Responsibilities included the analysis of business line profitability. Responsible for structuring reports to
meet financial reporting and analysis requirements. My accomplishments have included the following:
• Developed Business Line Income Statements by allocating general operating, selling, and administrative expenses to
determine profitability by line of business. Reports were by division’s three business lines and by location. This was a
system that I programmed with a software package that was integrated with the general ledger accounting system.
• Developed Lease Pricing System by reformatting the income statements previously developed into the form of a lease
contract for the purpose of setting prices by district location. System was integrated at the general ledger account level.
• Developed customer level reporting which established profitability reporting for all lease customer accounts. Utilized
field location information and expense allocations. Reconciled with the general ledger system.
Financial Analyst – Major responsibilities included financial reporting of division actuals, monthly forecasting, and the
coordination and preparation of yearly budgets. Responsible for divisions cash flow forecasting. The cash flow forecast consisted
of an analysis of balance sheet line items. Participated in budgeting a complete set of financial statements including the income
statement, balance sheet, and statement of cash flows. Participated in yearly planning cycle from initial profit plan through
general ledger account reporting. Budgeted balance sheet included supporting schedules for balance sheet line items. Responsible
for the preparation of budgeted income statements from thirty five district locations. Responsible for tracking modifications to
budgeted income statements by location. Responsible for the analysis of budget versus actual expenses. Budgeted information
was detailed at the general ledger account level. Participated in monthly forecasting including the monitoring of key variables,
operating characteristics, and the analysis of trends. Monitored reporting for new business, renewals, and expired business for
sales forecasting and budgeting. Prepared preliminary forecast information encompassing sales rate analysis, revenue per unit,
and fleet utilization reporting. Participated in forecasting a complete set of financial statements including the income statement,
balance sheet, and statement of cash flows. Responsible for financial modeling encompassing income projections and projected
earnings per share. Responsible for the analysis of division’s multi-location accounting. Reconciled divisions general ledger
account reporting. Responsibilities included reports for corporate and district management. Performed general ledger account
analysis in response to management inquires. Responsible for capital projects and for fixed asset accounting.
J.P. STEVENS & COMPANY, INC. -1185 Avenue of the Americas, New York, N.Y.
June 1977 – September 1979
Accountant – Participated in the preparation of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reporting including the annual 10K
and 10Q quarterly reports. Participated in the preparation of the annual report. Responsibilities included the preparation of
consolidated financial statements which included domestic and foreign operations. Prepared adjusted trial balance work sheets
including parent company and subsidiaries to facilitate the preparation of combined consolidated financial statements.
Participated in accounting for consolidations including the journal entries necessary for the elimination of intercompany accounts.
Consolidating journal entries included the elimination of intercompany sales and cost of goods sold, the elimination of subsidiary
equity, subsidiary income to outsiders, and intercompany receivables, notes, and bonds. Other responsibilities included the
elimination of intercompany profits from inventories, cost of goods sold, and from retained earnings. Responsible for the
maintenance of the company’s accounting books and records. Responsible for maintaining the corporate home office general
ledger. Responsible for general ledger account analysis which included the tracking of monthly cash receipts and disbursements.
GENERAL BUSINESS KNOWLEDGE:
I have recently continued to improve my academic skills and have devoted my time to the study of corporate finance, equity
valuation, investment analysis and portfolio management. I have become fairly expert with the following topics:
Managerial Finance Quantitative Equity Investing
Advanced Corporate Finance Macroeconomics
International Business Finance Microeconomics
Mergers & Acquisitions Econometric Modeling
Finance – Case Studies Competitive Advantage
Fixed Income Analysis Marketing Research
Portfolio Management Multivariate Statistics
Equity Valuation Models SAS Statistical Software
Equity Valuation – Inv. Banks Excel and VBA
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:
ADELPHI UNIVERSITY –September 1973 to June 1977. Graduated in June 1977 with a Bachelor of Business Administration.
Accounting major with 36 credits in accounting. Course work included Principles of Accounting, Intermediate Accounting,
Advanced Accounting, Managerial Finance, Economics, Money and Banking, Operations Management, and Marketing.
HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY –September 1990 to December 1992. Attended Master of Arts Degree program in mathematics.
Accumulated 18 credits with a 3.5 grade point average.
GRUMMAN DATA SYSTEMS INSTITUTE – April 1982 to March 1983. Completed one year of instruction in computer
programming and systems analysis.