ZDM Mathematics Education (****) **:*** ***
DOI *0.1007/s11858-007-0047-y
BOOK REVIEW
Bharath Sriraman (ed): International perspectives on social
justice in mathematics education. The Montana Mathematics
Enthusiast 2007 Monograph 1
The University of Montana Press, Missoula, MT, 2007. 185 pp. $20.00. Also available
on line at http://www.montanamath.org/TMME/. ISSN 1551-3440
Immaculate Kizito Namukasa
Accepted: 1 July 2007 / Published online: 21 July 2007
FIZ Karlsruhe 2007
International perspectives on social justice in mathematics broad conclusions to distinguish extent of agency and
education (henceforth the monograph) is edited by Bharath in uence. My evaluation of the monograph bears these
Sriraman and comprises 14 essays about critical mathe- criteria in mind to ascertain the extent to which it advances
matics education. The foreword is by Ubiratan D Ambrosio, a more democratic and socially just education.
whose work on ethnomathematics in particular and on
democratic and critical mathematics education in general
has re-conceptualized the mathematics education eld. 1 Essays about complexity and diversity
D Ambrosio observes that social justice allows us not only
to know what has been decided about ourselves and society
The monograph is about issues that arise with complexity
(which is the objective of re-productory and imitative
and diversity: peace, social justice and democracy. It seeks
education), but calls us to participate in decisions about
social justice for marginalized students, including rural,
ourselves and society (which is the objective of creative
inner-city, indigenous, immigrant, of low social-economic
critical education) (Foreword). D Ambrosio considers this
status and non-English-speaking learners. It encompasses
monograph to be an astonishing collection of scholarly
topics about early childhood, teacher education, school
articles from all over the world, offering perspectives of
programs, extra-curricular activities and community
tremendous importance to mathematics educators with an
education. It puts forward crucial research and practice
interest in social justice. For this review, I read the mono-
constructs including statistical empathy, students fore-
graph together with Michael Apple s work on critical
grounds and archeological digs of pedagogy.
mathematics pedagogies.
Sriraman says the book is an effort at collective
In his essay entitled Mathematics reform through con-
empowerment to facilitate social justice and equity. In this
servative modernization? Apple (2000a, b) warns that the
review I rst describe the content of the essays before I
analysis of what is has led to a neglect of what might
evaluate the monograph s contributions. I classify the
be . Describing the task of critical scholars to be polit-
articles as theoretical essays, research essays about a
ically and conceptually complex, he encourages reformers
speci c region or a speci c minority group, and general
to do both political and practical work that, (a) is local but
research essays. In the evaluation, I examine whether the
generalizable; systematic but not Eurocentric nor mascu-
theorists are aware of some of the pitfalls of critical theory
linist, (b) is connected to larger educational, social and
and pedagogy: being overly political and too general
ideological movements, (c) differentiates between con-
without offering solutions, assuming conspiracy, ushering
spiracy and over determinism, and (d) goes beyond overly
in the next oppressor, privileging direct causations and
control over individual and collective agency, and being
past-oriented.
I. K. Namukasa In the introductory essay, On the origins of social jus-
Althouse Faculty of Education Building,
The University of Western Ontario, tice: Darwin, Freire, Marx and Vivekananda, Sriraman
1137 Western Road, London, ON, Canada N6G 1G7
examines the fundamental reasons for research and practice
e-mail: ********@***.**
123
556 Book Review
among indigenous students in the United States might
in social justice. He gives a broad historical picture of the
emerge from the fact that new mathematical knowledge
relation of mathematics education to colonization, inter-
does not connect to indigenous ways of looking at quantity
nationalization and globalization. Drawing from the work
and measurement. In another essay, Before you divide,
of various theorists, Sriraman calls for education that
you have to add Inter-viewing Indian students fore-
promotes greater social consciousness. He maintains that
grounds, Skovsmose, Alro and Valero focus on Brazilian
such education is appropriate for initiating major shifts in
Indian students, speci cally their perceived future possi-
thinking that are needed to challenge inequities.
bilities in life their foregrounds. The essay introduces a
The second theoretical essay, Peace, social justice and
novel conceptualization of indigenous people as people
ethnomathematics, is by D Ambrosio, who identi es
who experience a position of con icting priorities and
mathematicians and mathematics educators as a group
possibilities in ways similar to the immigrant experiences
concerned with two universals that are somewhat con-
of people at the borderline of more than one culture.
icting, though they could be seen to be complementary,
Home, school and community partnerships in numeracy
based on: (a) the advancement of the most universal mode
education: an Australian perspective is by Goos, Lowrie
of thought mathematics; and, (b) the advancement of
and Jolly. It outlines partnerships that arise out of necessity
civilization with dignity for all the most universal prob-
in remote and disadvantaged areas. Two case studies are
lem facing humankind. By elaborating on the program of
examined: distance education for young children and mo-
ethnomathematics D Ambrosio calls mathematicians and
bile pre-school in remote Northern Australian Territory.
mathematics educators to take responsibility for restoring
Goos et al. maintain that there is a potential for these home
the dignity of those who have traditionally not performed
and community partnerships to blur barriers between
well at academic mathematics. D Ambrosio s essay offers
teachers, learners and parents, which they maintain is a
a valuable reminder to educators who often forget the
positive effect.
broader and global implications of their research and
In an essay regarding an integrative school program for
practice interests.
indigenous students in Israel, Amit, Fried and Abu-Naja
The third theoretical essay, Undertaking an archeologi-
report that the gifted students club actually served social
cal dig in search of pedagogical relay, is about methodol-
justice purposes for Bedouin indigenous minority students.
ogy. Zevenbergen and Flavel maintain that in mathematics
Their report, The mathematics club for excellent students
classrooms both mathematics and culture are taught. A
as common ground for Bedouin and other Israeli youth,
classroom can thus be considered an archeological site
illustrates how this program, which integrates gifted
re ecting the culture being taught. Zevenbergen and Fla-
indigenous students with mainstream gifted students, pro-
vel s archeological dig is a method for identifying those
motes mathematical thinking in students and social justice
elements of practice that may contribute to the success
in the community.
(or not) of students, particularly those from backgrounds
The monograph contains two essays about Iceland.
which are traditionally marginalized (p. 63).
Fundamental reasons for mathematics education in Iceland
The fourth theoretical essay, How many deaths?
by Bjarnadottir is a historical analysis on the presence and
Education for statistical empathy, contains graphics that I
absence of mathematics education in Iceland through the
found morbid and depressing. Mukhopadhyay and Greer
centuries. Iceland and rural/urban girls PISA 2003
are well aware of this morbidity, but argue that this is the
examined from an emancipatory viewpoint, by Steinthors-
lived experience of some students, even in countries that
dottir and Sriraman, is about the uniqueness of mathe-
are not war torn. They maintain that mathematics educators
matics education in Iceland. Bjarnadottir illustrates how
may expand what they call statistical empathy through
mathematics education in Iceland is historically related to
imaginative reframing of numerical data; through ingenuity
commerce, religion, colonialism and multilateral organi-
in the design of statistical diagrams and schematics repre-
zations. Iceland is the only country in PISA 2003 that had
sentations; and through simulations in ways similar to
statistically signi cant gender differences in achievement
what Florence Nightingale did and to what some artists are
in favor of females. Steinthorsdottir and Sriraman raise
doing (p. 133).
central questions about this gender gap, some of which
In addition to the four theoretical essays, there are ten
relate to reading comprehension as it correlates to school
research essays. Four of these are about speci c minority
mathematics. They raise further questions about the dis-
groups, two are articles about a speci c region and the
appearing or reversed differences between girls and boys.
remaining four are general research essays. Many of the
In Issues of status and values in the professional
essays are about indigenous people.
The rst paper on indigenous people is Some thoughts development of mathematics teachers, Knott observes that
on passive resistance to learning. Shockey and Gustafson in non-traditional, reform mathematics classes, exclusion-
hypothesize that passive resistance to learning evidenced ary behavior becomes pronounced. Teachers therefore need
123
Book Review 557
mathematics classrooms is not fundamentally the teaching
to be equipped to recognize the existence of low-status
sequence, misconception and other constructivist con-
students in their classrooms. The authors report on research
cerns [although these are key to learning], but it is poverty,
with K-12 teachers in which they model, discuss and
social disadvantage, low wages, poor housing, social
practice status-sensitive behaviors with teachers.
exclusion, limited opportunities (brackets added) (p. 9). In
Like the paper by Goos et al., Gutstein s essay, Con-
my view, researchers whether mainstream or critical
necting community, critical and classical knowledge in
theorists ought to have multiple foci, global and local,
teaching mathematics for social justice, is about commu-
creative yet critical, theoretical yet applicable. In a global
nity partnership and knowledge. Whereas Goos et al. study
context, we who focus on basic classroom research ought
Australian indigenous students, Gutstein studies African
to further enlarge the scope of our research to investigate
American students. He suggests that connecting commu-
the implications of our efforts in the face of forces such as
nity, critical and classical mathematics knowledge he
the internationalization, decentralization, privatization,
calls them the three Cs is part of the pedagogical content
marketization and globalization of education.
knowledge (PCK) teachers need. Gutstein views mathe-
The monograph is about evoking major shifts in think-
matics as a vehicle for social change (p. 110) and offers
ing needed to challenge inequities not only in the minds of
an example of how to engage students in projects that
teachers, but also for students at the class-
provide them a chance in school to examine their own
room inner level and for mathematicians and educators
lived experience, deepen their socio-political awareness,
at the university and college outer level. It is about
and learn mathematics (p. 115).
collective and individual sensitivities that are needed in
Christiansen s work is comparative. It identi es Some
education and in society in general. Apple (2000b) asserts
tensions in mathematics education for democracy, which
that the discourse of critical pedagogy in its Freirean and
become evident through comparative practice. She uses
feminist forms has increasingly been in uenced by post-
narratives from Denmark, South Africa and the United
modern theories. [This] has opened up the discourse to
States to illustrate how democratic education is often eth-
the criticism that it has become too theoretical, abstract,
nocentric, even if it has a critical intention.
esoteric, and out of touch with the con icts and struggles
In Mathematical marginalization and meritocracy:
that teachers, students, and activists act on (p. 253). I see
inequity in an English classroom, Noyes explores how
no reason why a psychoanalytic research report about the
school mathematics contributes to social strati cation in
responses to mathematics of students from families of low
English classrooms in the UK. He calls for reconsideration
socio-economic standing, for example, should be devoid of
of the social construction of ability and cautions about the
any immediate recommendations for an affected teacher or
potential inequity of ability grouping between schools,
student to act on.
between groups and within groups.
Many articles in the monograph give practical exam-
ples of how mathematics practioners and educators can
take on their ethical responsibility towards social justice.
2 Evaluation: old and emerging marginalization
In this way the monograph is not just political or critical.
Gutstein s essay, for instance, reports on a school project
Too often researchers get caught up in their research pro-
for African American students who were facing exclu-
grams without stopping to re ect on the implications of
sion from a predominantly Latina/o public high school
their research and reform recommendations. D Ambrosio
located in a community challenged by ambivalent rela-
critiques that once they move into their practice, as
tionships.
mathematicians and mathematics educators, something like
Reform mathematics education raises new social justice
a barrier appears and obfuscates their concern. They con-
issues. Unfortunately, such issues most often lie in the
tinue to do what they ever did. For mathematicians, priority
blind spots of researchers and educators who propose and
is to publish their research in the best journals and for math
promote reform. Critical mathematics pedagogies such as
educators, to propose, theorize and publish methods (p.
small group work, investigation projects, use of shared
26). This monograph challenges researchers and educators
materials and incorporating computer technology require
to think about the role and responsibility of research and
different classroom routines and competences, different
practice work in the inequities that pervade our society. It
home settings, as well as different study skills from those
is indeed a challenge for mainstream mathematics educa-
required in traditional mathematics pedagogies. Doerr and
tion researchers to continuously examine the connections
Chandler-Olcott (2005) note that reform-based curricula
between their own areas of study and the larger relations of
place new reading and writing demands on both teachers
unequal power (Apple 2000a, b), especially when their
and students. These demands affect marginalized students
focus is on the details of mathematics and mathematics
adversely because of their lack of cultural capital.
learning. For Gates (2000), the root cause of failure in
123
558 Book Review
by asking which is a stronger correlate of mathematics
Christiansen s work illustrates instances where routines
attainment social class or gender and ethnicity? Apple
and competences needed for socially just mathematics have
(2000a) encourages educators to weigh the relative ef cacy
been conceptualized, but they are ethnocentric and so raise
of these in uences, judging which ones are overly deter-
other critical minority issues. Knott s essay is an interesting
mining. It has been problematic to focus on only one form
example of educators working with teachers on skills and
of marginalization, such as class, as is usually the case with
competences required to deal with issues of status and
Marxist traditions, while other forms, such as race and
values that arise with small group classroom activities.
gender, have been neglected. This has been the case in
With many of the current educational policies and educa-
countries like Brazil (Apple 2000b). In addition to being
tional reforms, such as that of grouping by ability, some
rich in terms of representing different continents, the
marginalized groups such as non-English speaking and low
monograph could have included more comparative articles
socio-economic status students are becoming even more
and articles that deal with diversity.
disadvantaged or, should we say, more visible. It is crucial
Gutstein raises the need to ensure that mathematics
to have research that addresses new, emerging issues be-
does not get lost when developing critical knowledge and
fore they become debilitating lived experiences of mar-
supporting students social political consciousness in
ginalized students.
mathematics classrooms (p. 112). In my view this caution
Unequal economic, political and cultural power has
is applicable to projects about critical mathematics edu-
meant that in addition to the traditional minority groups,
cation. Essays on critical mathematics education that are
new minority groups are emerging. It is social Darwinism
devoid of mathematics and its teaching and learning are not
at its worst. The monograph addresses some emerging
helpful. I encourage the reader to keep wondering where
minority issues: minority students such as children of
the mathematics is as you read critical mathematics edu-
transient workers (Sriraman); and special abilities and
cation essays in this monograph and elsewhere. Many es-
needs such as those of resistant mathematics learners
says, such as the one by Mukhopadhyay and Greer,
(Shockey & Gustafson). The understanding of indigenous
contribute to new mathematics, in this case by proposing
students in relation to another marginalized group of stu-
new statistical diagrams that encourage statistical empathy.
dents is interesting in regard to nding out what is similar
Such work offers an alternative to mathematics that per-
and what is different between marginalized groups. It is a
petuates unequal distribution of power (Namukasa 2004). It
step in teasing out what the balance of forces [that affect
marginalized students is] and what is necessary to demonstrates actual successes of critical models of cur-
riculum, teaching, and evaluation in solving real problems
change it (Apple 2000b).
in schools and communities (Apple 2000b, p. 252).
Today s students lived experiences are diverse. To re-
As I read the monograph I considered whether it brings
ect on the implications of our practice and research efforts
new theoretical voices and analyses to the eld of critical
we may need to pay attention to students lived experiences
mathematics and mathematics education. Does the mono-
that are far from imaginable for us and far removed from
graph involve multiple critical pedagogies? Sriraman and
our own lived experiences. Unfortunately, more students
D Ambrosio, in addition to Darwin, Freire and Marx, draw
now experience war, gun violence and death on a daily
from Vivekanda and Pugwash. Skovsmose et al. bring a
basis. Mukhopadhyay and Greer s essay, though morbid
novel conceptualization of indigenous students in relation
and depressing, is therefore timely.
to immigrant students. And Zevenbergen and Flavel offer a
During the early days, research on marginalized students
new methodological analysis the archeological classroom
focused on one aspect of marginalization, usually gender
dig. There could have been more of this, including voices
(Namukasa 2004). For many of today s marginalized stu-
of environmental sustainability. Voices about Africa and
dents, inopportunity it is a matrix of disadvantages: English
China appear to be missing in the international critical
learner, indigenous, of low socio-economic status, in an
mathematics education conversation. Apple (2000b)
inner city school or in an isolated reserve school. These
encourages that discourses of critical pedagogies be
disadvantages correlate and interact in minority students
grounded in the concrete struggles of multiple and iden-
and mathematics classrooms in varying and complex ways.
ti able groups (p. 253).
Some of the essays in the monograph deal with individual
What is missing in the monograph is compensated for by
disadvantages, whereas others deal with multiple disad-
the fact that the monograph offers practical solutions, based
vantages in intersecting ways. For example, Goos et al.
on both empirical and theoretical study. It does not just
deal with indigenous, non-English speaking and low-status
dwell on the past, and it is neither overly theoretical nor
students who are low achievers and live in geographically
esoteric. Its major strength is that it is in touch with the
isolated locations and who are thus inevitably at risk of
ever-changing con icts and struggles faced by teachers and
failing to meet state standards. We also see articles such as
students.
Noyes, which attempts to examine the extent of in uence
123
Book Review 559
References curricula in urban middle schools. Paper presented at the annual
meeting of the North American Chapter of the International
Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Roanoke,
Apple, M. W. (2000a). Mathematics reform through conservative
20 23 October 2005
modernization? Standards, markets, and inequality in education.
Gates, P. (2000). Markets, marx, modernity and mathematics
In: J. Boaler (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics
education: a response to Michael apple. Paper presented at the
teaching and learning (pp. 171 200). London: Ablex.
second international mathematics education and society confer-
Apple, M. (2000b). Can critical pedagogies interrupt rightist policies?
ence, Montechoro, 26 31 March 2000
Educ Theory, 50(2), 229 254
Namukasa, I. (2004). Globalization and school mathematics. Inter-
Doerr, H. & Chandler-Olcott, K. (2005). Mathematics and literacy:
change, 35(2), 209 227
an interdisciplinary perspective on teaching with reform-based
123