Post Job Free

Resume

Sign in

Real Estate C

Location:
Cedar Grove, IN
Posted:
January 09, 2013

Contact this candidate

Resume:

State of New Jersey

NJLRC

New Jersey Law Revision Commission

FINAL REPORT

relating to

INTEREST AND USURY

MARCH 1998

NEW JERSEY LAW REVISION COMMISSION

*** ****** ******, *** **., Box 47016

Newark, New Jersey 07101

973-***-****

(Fax) 648-3123

email: abqfwa@r.postjobfree.com

web site: http://www.lawrev.state.nj.us

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION 2

RECOMMENDATION 4

LEGAL ANALYSIS 4

The New Jersey Interest and Usury Statute

4

Exceptions to Usury Rate Contained in Other New Jersey Law

6

Federal Law 8

Necessary Conforming Amendments

9

CONCLUSION 10

RECOMMENDED REVISIONS TO NEW JERSEY STATUTES

11

1. Recommended Amendment to Title 2C of the Code of Criminal Justice

11

2. Recommended Amendment of Title I. Acts, Laws and Statutes

13

3. Recommended New Section

14

4. Recommended Conforming Amendments

14

5. Recommended Repeals 35

.

c:\rpts\usury.doc

1

INTRODUCTION

The current New Jersey usury statute is based on the 1877 Revised statutes.1 In

the 19th century, the maximum permitted interest rate on a loan of money was 6%, a rate

that today would have the effect of terminating the credit business in New Jersey. Later,

the statute was amended to establish two rates: (1) 6% per year on an oral contract to lend

money or any thing of value, and (2) 16% per year if the contract is written and the

contract specifies the interest rate.2 The statute itself contains several exceptions to the

two base rates.3 The most important exceptions are the ones for first lien mortgages for

4

residential property, and for other loans exceeding $50,000.

Though the statute appears to establish a simple and workable system of regulating

interest rates, this is not the case. Changes in the banking industry have required New

Jersey to exempt large categories of loans from the usury statute. Federal deregulation of

banking and federal preemption of state usury laws for first lien residential mortgages have

weakened the New Jersey usury statute.5 The usury statute does not apply to national

banks doing business in New Jersey, further limiting the statute s jurisdiction.

Consequently, the usury statute is not a comprehensive statement of the regulation of

interest rates in New Jersey. Its main effect on New Jersey law is to obfuscate the rules

setting lawful interest rates and thereby to impose an unnecessary information cost on the

credit industry.

There are four categories of loans that the usury statute does not cover. First,

purchases under revolving credit accounts, installment loan purchases and purchases under

credit card accounts are exempted from the usury statute under what is called the time-

price differential doctrine.6 This doctrine creates the legal fiction that the extension of

1

Rev. 1877, p. 519, 1, as am. By L.1878, c.26, 1, p.30 [C.S. p. 5704, 1].

2

N.J.S.A. 31:1-1.

3

E.g., N.J.S.A. 31:1-1(b).

4

N.J.S.A. 31:1-1(b); N.J.S.A. 31:1-1(e).

5

See discussion ofFederal Law infra at 9.

6

E.g., Steffenauer v. Mytelka & Rose, Inc., 87 N.J. Super. 506 (App. Div. 1965)(finding

that installment sale contract containing finance charge did not constitute a loan bearing interest

but reflected a time price differential).

c:\rpts\usury.doc

2

credit is not a loan of money but an adjustment in price for the privilege of delaying

payment. Consequently, an enormous class of sales finance transactions, some carrying

interest rates that can exceed 20% per year, do not even come within the jurisdiction of

the statute. Second, national banks may charge the interest rate allowed to the state s

most favored lender.7 A national bank hence may lend money to a New Jersey resident in

complete disregard of the usury statute and set the highest permitted rate allowable in

New Jersey for its most favored lender. In New Jersey, credit unions may lend at any rate

agreed to between the parties.8 Therefore national banks may charge any agreed upon

interest rate.

Third, national and federally insured banks may export the interest rates of the

states in which they are chartered to borrowers located in foreign jurisdictions.9 For

example, a bank located in North Dakota can charge interest to a New Jersey borrower at

North Dakota rates. Fourth, federal law has pre-empted state usury statutes for first lien

residential mortgages. Thus, federally insured banks may charge any interest rate to a

New Jersey home buyer.

The practical collapse of the usury statute proves that it does not work. The

realities of the marketplace and the development of a national credit industry have been

the statute s undoing. The New Jersey Legislature, by enacting so many exceptions to the

statute, has explicitly recognized the difficulty of controlling interest rates at the state

level. The usury statute now is the exception to the general rule that there are no limits on

credit except for those within the criminal usury law. Elimination of usury rates has not

resulted in disaster. This conclusion is evidenced by the residential mortgage business

where market forces, not governmental controls, are responsible for the relatively low

interest rates enjoyed by borrowers in the 1990 s.

7

E.g., United Bank of Kansas City v. Danforth, 394 F. Supp. 774, 779 (W.D. Mo.

1975)(containing modern statement of most favored lender rule).

8

N.J.S.A. 17:13-104(b).

9

E.g., Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp., 439

U.S. 299 (1978)(finding that national bank may charge its out-of-state customers higher interest

rates than that allowed by customer s jurisdiction).

c:\rpts\usury.doc

3

The New Jersey usury statute is a throw-back to the days when banking was a

matter of local concern. In the United States, the tradition of local banking was extremely

strong and persistent. National banks were created only after the Civil War, and the

United States did not establish its current central bank until 1911. Under these

conditions, a state could effectively regulate interest rates and protect its borrowers by

usury laws since banks served local communities and made investments tailored to the

needs of its community. However, interest rates now are established mainly at the national

level. Legal barriers to interstate banking have been removed and the legislative trend is

to allow banks to conduct business across state borders. These legal developments have

undercut the importance of New Jersey s usury law and have laid the basis for a

reconsideration of the theory and policy of attempting to control interest rates at the state

level.

RECOMMENDATION

The Commission recommends the repeal of the New Jersey civil usury statute, and

the enactment of a statute giving the Executive limited authority to regulate interest rates

in an emergency. Under the Commission s proposal, the setting of interest rates would be

determined by the market forces of supply and demand for credit. Under limited

circumstances, the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance would have the authority to

promulgate a self-terminating interest rate regulation. The repeal of the civil usury statute

would have no major impact on New Jersey borrowers due to the fact that the current

usury statute affects such a small class of loan agreements. The repeal also would not

disturb regulatory and licensing schemes governing lenders.

LEGAL ANALYSIS

The New Jersey Interest and Usury Statute

The New Jersey usury statute is found at N.J.S.A. 31:1-1 to 31:1-9. Section 31:1-

1(a) establishes two basic legal rates of interest. First, the maximum rate of interest on a

loan of money or other thing of value based on an oral contract is $6 for the forbearance

c:\rpts\usury.doc

4

of $100 in any year, or stated as a simple interest rate, 6% per year. Second, the

maximum rate of interest on a loan of money or other thing of value based on a written

contract specifying a rate of interest is $16 for the forbearance of $100 in any year, or

stated as a simple rate of interest, 16% per year.

The statute contains five exceptions to the basic rate. First, Section 31:1-1(b)

gives the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance authority to establish by regulation

interest rates for first lien mortgages on residential property. This interest rate may not

exceed the Monthly Index of Long Term Government Bond Yields plus 8%. Second,

Section 31:1-1(e)(1) permits the parties to agree on any interest rate related to non-first

lien residential loans the amount of which exceeds $50,000. Third, Section 31:1-1(e)(2)

provides an exception for residential mortgages packaged for sale on the secondary

market to federally established programs. Fourth, Section 31:1-1(g) excepts the basic rate

of interest for certain business and agricultural loans.

Fifth, Section 31:1-1.1 allows New Jersey state banks to charge any rate a national

bank is allowed to charge New Jersey borrowers. This exception was needed to allow

state banks to compete with national banks.10 Under a line of cases beginning with Tiffany

v. National Bank of Missouri, 85 U.S. 409 (1873), the most favored lender doctrine has

allowed national banks systematically to ignore state usury rates. The underlying theory is

that Congress, in enacting the national banking act, intended to prefer national banks over

state banks. In response, the New Jersey legislature enacted the state bank parity act,

which allows state banks to lend money at a rate equal to the rate allowed by Federal law

or regulation to be charged by national banking associations.

N.J.S.A. 17:13B-1 et seq.

The penalty for violating the usury rate limits is found at Section 31:1-3. The

lender forfeits the entire interest and is entitled to recover only the principal of the loan.

The remaining sections of the usury statute deal with a variety of related topics: 31:1-2

(compelling a witness to testify); 31:1-4 (permitting borrower to compel discovery in

10

Note that state bank parity obviates Section 31:1-1(b), the limited exception for first lien

residential mortgages, and that state bank parity is obviated, at least for first lien residential

mortgages, by the federal preemption of state usury laws for residential mortgages.

c:\rpts\usury.doc

5

action based on statutory violation); 31:1-5 (providing special provision for sale of

railroad and canal bonds below par value); 31:1-6 (eliminating defense of usury for

corporations issuing debt obligations); 31:1-7 (exempting subdivisions of government that

raise money in the bond market from the usury statute); 31:1-8 (containing liberal

construction clause); and 31:1-9 (containing statement on effect of 1969 amendment).

Since these sections are unrelated to the question of whether the usury statute should be

repealed, they do not require further discussion.

Exceptions to Usury Rate Contained in Other New Jersey Law

The state of interest rate regulation in New Jersey cannot be derived from an

isolated analysis of the New Jersey usury statute. Reliance on the statute itself is a trap for

the unwary and wary alike. For example, the explicit statement of the statute that it

applies not only to loans of money but to loans of things is misleading in light of the

meaning of the Retail Installment Sales Act (RISA). N.J.S.A. 17:16C-1 et seq. That

statute applies to goods, very broadly defined, purchased on time, that is, at a price

more than the sales price if the goods are paid for at the point of purchase. In economic

terms, the financed purchase price is an interest rate. However, in legal parlance, the

difference between the original purchase price and final financed price is called the time

price differential and does not represent an interest rate. Steffaneur v. Mytelka & Rose,

Inc., 87 N.J. Super 506, 516 (App. Div. 1965). Hence, goods with a purchase price of

$10,000 or less and purchased on credit are subject to RISA but are not subject to the

usury statute. Goods having a value greater than $10,000 are subject to neither law.

The Steffenauer rationale also applies to department store revolving credit card

agreements and to extensions of credit when goods are purchased by bank credit cards.

Sliger v. R. H. Macy & Co., 59 N.J. 465 (1971)(applying time price differential doctrine

to revolving charge account agreements); Sherman v. Citibank (S.D.), N.A., 143 N.J. 35

(1995) (applying provisions of RISA to credit card purchase). The net effect of the time

price differential doctrine to is to move an enormous and important category of credit

c:\rpts\usury.doc

6

purchases out of the sphere of interest rate regulation where, at least in legislative design,

it would have its greatest consumer benefit.

Additionally, the current law leads to the following irrational regulatory result.

The rate of interest lenders may charge on consumer loans $15,000 or less may be set as

high as 30%. The rate of interest lenders may charge on consumer loans ranging between

$15,000 and $50,000 may be set only to a maximum rate of 16%. The rate of interest

lenders may charge on consumer loans exceeding $50,000 may be set as high as 30%.

This division of categories defies logic. In terms of consumer protection, there is no

reason to lift usury protection for consumers borrowing $15,000 or less, while providing

special protections for consumers borrowing in the range between $15,000 to $50,000.

Exceptions to the usury statute further augment the class of loans not subject to

the legal rate of interest. Many statutes explicitly except the application of the usury

statute to extensions of credit. E.g., the Market Rate Consumer Loan Act, N.J.S.A.

17:3B-4 et seq.(allowing lender, as defined in Act, to charge interest on revolving credit

plan at any rate unless prohibited by criminal usury statute); Consumer Small Loan Act,

N.J.S.A. 17:10-1 et seq.(exempting loan of money in the amount of $15,000 or less from

usury rate); Secondary Mortgage Loan Business Act, N.J.S.A. 17:11A-35 et seq.(allowing

lender to make open end-loan to borrower at any agreed upon rate); Licensed Lender

Act, N.J.S.A. 17:11C-1 et seq.(allowing lender and borrower to set rate by agreement for

second mortgage loans and first mortgage loans; and allowing consumer and licensed

lender to set rate by agreement on loans under $15,000); Insurance Premium Financing

Act, N.J.S.A. 16D-1 et seq.(permitting premium finance company to charge any rate of

interest on finance charge agreed to by parties); Banking Act of 1948, N.J.S.A. 17:9A-

59.1(providing for any rate agreed on between bank and customer for overdraft privileges)

and N.J.S.A. 17:9A-59.6(allowing bank to charge agreed on rate for advance loans); and

Revolving Loan Act, N.J.S.A. 17:3B-29 et seq. (allowing bank to charge agreed on rate

for open-end loans).

c:\rpts\usury.doc

7

The exceptions and exemptions to the usury statute have produced a complicated

set of legal rules regulating interest rates. The civil usury statute has in effect become an

exception to the general rule that parties may establish a rate of interest by contract

subject to the limitations of the criminal usury law. While freedom of contract may

comprise the general rule in many cases, the set of legal rules and regulations surrounding

the area of credit is so dense that in some cases lenders and borrowers may be unsure of

the legal status of the credit agreement. The unnecessary multiplication of categories

involving loans and their applicable legal interest rates is illustrated by a list entitled

Current Usury Limitations as of September 22, 1988, prepared by the New Jersey

Department of Banking. It specifies interest limits separately for commercial banks and

savings banks for each of 18 categories of loan. Though the list is dated, it illustrates how

the usury statute has caused an unnecessary level of complication in determining the lawful

rate of interest on any particular loan.

Federal Law

The United States Supreme Court held in Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis

v. First of Omaha Corp., 439 U.S. 299 (1978) that a national bank may charge its out-of-

state customers an interest rate on unpaid credit card balances allowed by its home state

where that rate is greater than that permitted by the state of the bank s non-resident

customers. The United States Supreme Court in Smiley v. Citibank, 517 U.S. 735 (1996)

strengthened that decision. Reaffirming that a national bank may charge out of state credit

card customers interest at the rate allowed by the bank s home state even when that rate is

higher than the rate permitted by the state where the card holder resides, the Court held

11

that the term interest included late payment fees charged by the national bank.

The United States Supreme Court in Tiffany v. National Bank of Missouri, 85 U.S.

409 (1873) held that national banks may charge rates of interest allowed by the states to

11

The Smiley case directly overruled the New Jersey Supreme Court in Sherman v.

Citibank, (S.D.), N.A. 143 N.J. 35 (1995)(holding that South Dakota national bank cannot charge

late fee because under New Jersey law late fee is not interest). By implication, Smiley also

overruled Hunter v. Greenwood Trust, 143 N.J. 97 (1995)(holding that Delaware federally insured

state bank cannot charge late fee because under New Jersey law late fee is not interest).

c:\rpts\usury.doc

8

natural persons generally, and a higher rate, if state banks of issue were authorized to

charge a higher rate. Id. at 413. The case enunciated what is now referred to as the

most favored lender doctrine. The courts have continued to allow national banks to

select the highest rate permitted to lenders generally within the state. Richard E. Brophy,

Jr., State Usury Laws and National Banks, 31 Baylor L. Rev. 169,171 (1979); See, Saul v.

Midlantic Nat. Bank/South, 240 N.J. Super. 62 (App. Div. 1990)(finding that under most

favored lender doctrine Midlantic could charge the rate of interest a New Jersey credit

union could charge, that is, anything agreed to between borrower and lender). The

Comptroller of the Currency has also found that a national bank may charge interest at

the maximum rate permitted by state law to any competing state chartered or licensed

lending institution. Brophy, supra at 173.

In 1980, Congress enacted the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary

Control Act (DIDA). Pub. L. No. 96-221, 94 Stat. 161 (Mar. 31, 1980). This act, in

part, pre-empted state law with regard to first lien residential mortgage loans, whether for

home purchases or other uses, such as first lien home equity loans. The preemption

applies to interest, discount points, finance charges or other charges. While DIDA gave

states a 3 year window in which to override the federal exemption of usury limits, New

Jersey did not exercise that option and no usury rate applies to any first lien residential

mortgage loan executed in New Jersey today by a banking institution or housing

creditor.

Necessary Conforming Amendments

There are two major practical effects of repealing the interest and usury statute.

First, government would have no authority to stabilize the market in an economic crisis.

Second, other statutes, which refer to lawful or legal interest, depend on the interest

and usury statute to determine the meaning of their terms. Without the referent of the

civil usury statute, these statutes would be subject to re-interpretation.

To cope with unusual conditions that cause non-competitive interest rates, the

Commission recommends that the Legislature enact a statute giving the Commissioner of

c:\rpts\usury.doc

9

the Department of Banking and Insurance the authority to promulgate a regulation

controlling interest rates in an emergency. Any regulation promulgated under this power

would expire automatically two years after its effective date to assure that the regulation

does not outlive the emergency to which it responds. This allocation of authority to the

Executive does not create a method to circumvent market interest rates. Its purpose is to

permit government to intercede in the market when the market has demonstrated its

inability to self-correct.

To provide a definition of lawful interest rate, the Commission recommends that

the Legislature enact a statute defining the terms lawful or legal interest. The

Commission s recommended definition is based on the Court Rule interest rate. R. 4:42-

11(a)(ii). That rate is based on the average rate of return received by the New Jersey Cash

Management Fund.

CONCLUSION

In essence, New Jersey s usury statute applies mainly to a limited class of loans:

(1) first lien residential mortgage loans made by persons that are not housing creditors

under federal law, (2) junior lien residential loans made by persons that are not required to

be licensed under the Licensed Lender Act, (3) consumer loans exceeding $15,000 but less

than $50,000, (4) consumer loans made by parties that are not licensed lenders, and (5)

commercial loans under $50,000 that are secured by non-residential real estate or personal

property, or that are unsecured loans.

The New Jersey usury statute can no longer regulate interest rates effectively.

Exceptions to the usury statute, the export of interest rates by out-of-state lenders into

New Jersey, the most favored lender doctrine and federal preemption reduce the benefits

of the New Jersey usury statute. Its principal effect is to create confusion in the credit

area. Attorneys for lenders are faced with the daunting task of determining whether the

rates their clients charge are lawful under the scheme of statutes regulating interest rates.

Given the multiplication of categories and the interaction of federal law, any residual

benefits of the usury law are outweighed by the cost of this wasteful intellectual labor.

c:\rpts\usury.doc

10

The benefits of the repeal are self-evident. Lenders and borrowers alike are

subject only to the two criminal usury rates and thus they are likely to be aware of them.

Second, as a practical matter, the repeal should have absolutely no effect on interest rates.

As already explained, most rates on loans and extensions of credit are not subject to the

civil usury statute. This freedom from regulatory control has not led to the establishment

of punitive interest rates. Rather, the borrowing community has had access to a wider

range of interest rates and lenders.

RECOMMENDED REVISIONS TO NEW JERSEY STATUTES

The repeal of the usury statute would require the Legislature to adopt the

following recommendations of the Commission: (1) a style modification of the New Jersey

criminal usury statute to reflect the repeal of its civil counterpart, (2) a statute authorizing

the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance to regulate interest rates in an emergency, (3)

a statute defining the term lawful interest rate, and (4) technical conforming amendments

to numerous laws that refer to the usury statute.

1. Recommended Amendment to Title 2C of the Code of Criminal Justice

2C:21-19. Wrongful Credit Practices and Related Offenses.

a. Criminal usury. A person is guilty of criminal usury when not being authorized

or permitted by law to do so, he:

(1) lends money or other property to a natural person at an interest rate exceeding

30% per year, or,

(2) lends money or other property to a business entity with limited liability at an

interest rate exceeding 50% per year.

The phrase lends money or other property includes: (1) making a loan directly or

indirectly, (2) agreeing to lend money or other property, (3) taking money or other

property as interest on a loan or (4) agreeing to take money or other property as interest

on a loan.

[(1) Loans or agrees to loan, directly or indirectly, any money or other property[ at

a rate exceeding the maximum rate permitted by law; or

c:\rpts\usury.doc

11

(2) Takes, agrees to take, or receives any money or other property as interest on

the loan or on the forbearance of any money or other interest] in excess of the maximum

rate permitted by law.

For the purposes of this section and notwithstanding any law of this State which

permits as a maximum interest rate a rate or rates agreed to by the parties of the

transaction, any loan or forbearance with an interest rate which exceeds 30% per annum

shall not be a rate authorized or permitted by law, except if the loan or forbearance is

made to a corporation any rate not in excess of 50% per annum shall be a rate authorized

or permitted by law.]

Criminal usury is a crime of the second degree if the rate of interest on any loan

made to any person exceeds 50% per annum or the equivalent rate for a longer or shorter

period. It is a crime of the third degree if the interest rate on any loan made to any person

except a corporation does not exceed 50% per annum but the amount of the loan or

forbearance exceeds $1,000.00. Otherwise, making a loan to any person in violation of

subsection a.(1) and a.(2) of this section is a disorderly persons offense.

b. Business of criminal usury. Any person who knowingly engages in the business

of making loans or forbearances in violation of subsection a. of this section is guilty of a

crime of the second degree and, notwithstanding the provisions of N.J.S.A. 2C:43-3, shall

be subject to a fine of not more than $250,000.00 and any other appropriate disposition

authorized by N.J.S.A. 2C:43-2b.

c. Possession of usurious loan records. A person is guilty of a crime of the third

degree when, with knowledge of the nature thereof, he possesses any writing, paper

instrument or article used to record criminally usurious transactions prohibited by

subsection a. of this section.

d. Unlawful collection practices. A person is guilty of a disorderly persons offense

when, with purpose to enforce a claim or judgment for money or property, he sends, mails

or delivers to another person a notice, document or other instrument which has no judicial

or official sanction and which in its format or appearance simulates a summons, complaint,

court order or process or an insignia, seal or printed form of a federal, State or local

government or an instrumentality thereof, or is otherwise calculated to induce a belief that

such notice, document or instrument has a judicial or official sanction.

e. Making a false statement of credit terms. A person is guilty of a disorderly

persons offense when he understates or fails to state the interest rate, or makes a false or

inaccurate or incomplete statement of any other credit terms.

f. Debt adjusters. Any person who shall act or offer to act as a debt adjuster shall

be guilty of a crime of the fourth degree.

"Debt adjuster" means a person who either (1) acts or offers to act for a

consideration as an intermediary between a debtor and his creditors for the purpose of

settling, compounding, or otherwise altering the terms of payment of any debts of the

debtor, or (2) who, to that end, receives money or other property from the debtor, or on

behalf of the debtor, for payment to, or distribution among, the creditors of the debtor.

c:\rpts\usury.doc

12

"Debtor" means an individual or two or more individuals who are jointly and severally, or

jointly or severally indebted.

The following persons shall not be deemed debt adjusters for the purposes of this

section: an attorney at law of this State who is not principally engaged as a debt adjuster; a

nonprofit social service or consumer credit counseling agency licensed pursuant to P.L.

1979, c. 16 (C. 17:16G-1 et seq.); a person who is a regular, full-time employee of a

debtor, and who acts as an adjuster of his employer's debts; a person acting pursuant to

any order or judgment of court, or pursuant to authority conferred by any law of this State

or of the United States; a person who is a creditor of the debtor, or an agent of one or

more creditors of the debtor, and whose services in adjusting the debtor's debts are

rendered without cost to the debtor; or a person who, at the request of the debtor,

arranges for or makes a loan to the debtor, and who, at the authorization of the debtor,

acts as an adjuster of the debtor's debts in the disbursement of the proceeds of the loan,

without compensation for the services rendered in adjusting such debts.

Comment

This amendment is necessitated by the repeal of the civil usury statute, N.J.S.A. 31:1-1 et seq. It

establishes a criminal rate of 30% for natural persons and 50% for corporations unless other law, such as

DIDA, is interpreted to permit the charging of interest at a rate greater than the rates stated in the

criminal statute.

2. Recommended Amendment of Title I. Acts, Laws and Statutes

[New Section] Definition of lawful interest rate

The terms lawful interest, legal interest, or any equivalent term, means the

annual rate of interest equal to the average rate of return, to the nearest whole or one-half

percent, for the corresponding preceding fiscal year terminating June 30 of the New Jersey

Cash Management Fund (State accounts) as reported by the Division of Investment in the

Department of the Treasury.

Comment

This statute is necessitated by the repeal of the civil usury statute, N.J.S.A. 31:1-1 et seq. The

terms lawful or legal interest rate, which appear in several statutes, depend the civil usury statute for

their meaning, generally understood to mean the 6% civil usury rate. The repeal of the civil usury statute

has the potential to call into question the meaning of the terms lawful or legal interest. Hence, this

statute provides a meaning for these terms based on the standard used in New Jersey Court Rule 4:42-

11(a)(ii).

c:\rpts\usury.doc

13

3. Recommended New Section

[New section] Regulation of interest rates

If the Commissioner of the Department of Banking and Insurance finds that there

is a market dislocation that restricts the public s access to credit, the Commissioner may

adopt a regulation limiting the rate of interest charged by lenders. The Commissioner shall

not regulate interest rates unless the benefit of the regulation outweighs any negative

impact of the rate on the operation of the free market. The regulation shall expire twenty

four months after the date it is adopted unless sooner repealed by the Commissioner.

Comment

This statute replaces the civil usury statute, N.J.S.A. 31:1-1 et seq. Its purpose is to give the

Commissioner of Banking and Insurance authority to set a maximum interest rate in cases of emergency.

The term market dislocation means that the ordinary forces of supply and demand for credit no longer

operate to set the price of money. Increases in the cost of credit alone are inadequate to meet this

standard. Rather, to use this authority, the Commissioner must make two findings based on reliable

evidence. First, the Commissioner must find that the market has lost its capacity for self-correction.

Second, the Commissioner must find that the benefit of regulation outweighs the harm of state

intervention in the marketplace. The premise of the statute is that this emergency authority will rarely, if

ever, be exercised. To make certain that this emergency authority is not abused, any regulation

promulgated hereunder expires automatically twenty four months after its adoption.

4. Recommended Conforming Amendments

12A:10-104. Statutes saved from repeal.

The following statutes and parts of statutes and all amendments thereof are hereby

specifically saved from repeal and shall remain effective as provided in section 12A:9-203:

Uniform Act for Simplification of Fiduciary Security Transfers

1959 laws, chapter 200 (14:18-1 through 14:18-12),

The Banking Act of 1948

1948 laws, chapter 67, 54 (17:9A-54), 55 (17:9A-55), 59 (17:9A-59),

Small Loan Law

R.S. 17:10-1 through R.S. 17:10-26, 1958 laws, chapter 107 supplementing the

same,

Provident Loan Associations

R.S. 17:11-1 through R.S. 17:11-12, 1953 laws, chapter 353 (17:11-13 through

17:11-18),

Savings and Loan Act

c:\rpts\usury.doc

14

1946 laws, chapter 56, 78 (17:12A-78), 79 (17:12A-79),

(Deleted by amendment, P.L. [1984], c. [171]),

Safe Deposit Companies Law

R.S. 17:14-1 throughR.S. 17:14-8,

Investment Companies Law

1938 laws, chapter 322, 1 through 20 (17:16A-1 through 17:16A-20),

Retail Installment Sales Act of 1960

1960 laws, chapter 40 (17:16C-1 through 17:16C-61),

Home Repair Financing Act

1960 laws, chapter 41 (17:16C-62 through 17:16C-94),

[Usury Law

R.S. 31:1-1 throughR.S. 31:1-6,]

Assignment or Purchase of Wages Law

R.S. 34:11-25, R.S. 34:11-26,

Motor Vehicle Certificate of Ownership Law

R.S. 39:10-1 throughR.S. 39:10-25,

Pawnbrokers and Dealers in Secondhand Goods Law

R.S. 45:22-1 through R.S. 45:22-34, 1939 laws, chapter 55, 1 through 7

(45:22-35 through 45:22-41),

Chattel Mortgages Included in Realty Mortgages

R.S. 46:28-10, R.S. 46:28-14,

Bridge Companies Law

R.S. 48:5-18,

Railroads Law

R.S. 48:12-18,

Street Railways Law

R.S. 48:15-15.

L. 1961, c. 120. Amended. L. 1962, c. 203, L. 1967, c. 146, L. 1984, c. 171.

17:2-6. General powers.

Savings banks, banks, banking institutions, trust companies, building and loan

associations, savings and loan associations, mortgage companies and insurance companies

organized under any general or special law of this State, all boards, commissions and

c:\rpts\usury.doc

15

departments of the State Government and of the various counties and municipalities

thereof, and executors, administrators, trustees, guardians and other fiduciaries are

authorized:

a. To make such real estate mortgage loans as may be guaranteed or insured in

whole or in part by the United States of America or the State of New Jersey, or by any

officer, agency or instrumentality of either of them, or for which a commitment to so

guarantee or insure has been made, and to invest in, purchase or otherwise acquire, own

or hold, mortgage notes or bonds so guaranteed or insured;

b. To cause such mortgage securities to be and be kept so guaranteed or insured

and to pay for and receive the benefits of such guarantees or insurance;

c. To invest in, purchase or otherwise acquire, own and hold notes, bonds,

debentures, capital stock or other such obligations of any national mortgage association;

provided, the issuance of such notes, bonds, debentures, capital stock or other such

obligations has been approved by the Federal Housing Administrator. Nothing in sections

17:2-5 to 17:2-8 of this Title contained shall be construed to empower any fiduciary to

make any investment or commitment in capital stock pursuant to paragraph "c" of this

section;

d. To make loans for the purpose of financing the purchase of or refinancing an

existing ownership interest in certificates of stock or other evidence of an ownership

interest in, and a proprietary lease from, a corporation or partnership formed for the

purpose of cooperative ownership of real estate in this State.

Such institutions may, subject to such regulations as the commissioner finds

necessary and proper, invest to an amount not exceeding 85% per annum of the purchase

price or, in the case of a refinancing, the appraised value of certificates of stock or other

evidence of an ownership interest in and a proprietary lease from, a corporation or

partnership formed for the purpose of the cooperative ownership of real estate within the

State, for the purpose of financing a purchase of or refinancing an existing ownership

interest in such a corporation or partnership, provided (1) such investment is secured

within 90 days from the making of the loan by an assignment or transfer of the stock or

other evidence of an ownership interest of the borrower and a proprietary lease; and (2)

repayment of principal and interest shall be effected within 30 years. [Notwithstanding any

other provision of law, the maximum rate of interest which may be charged, taken or

received upon any loan or forbearance made pursuant to this subsection may exceed by no

more than 1 1/2% per annum the rate of interest prescribed by the commissioner which is

applicable to mortgage loans on one-to-six family dwellings a portion of which may be

used for commercial purposes, pursuant to the provisions of 31:1-1 et seq.]

R.S.

Amended. L. 1938, c. 52; L. 1968, c. 33; L. 1977, c. 94.

17:3B-7. Interest.

[Notwithstanding the provisions of R.S. 31:1-1, a] A lender may, subject to the

criminal usury provisions of N.J.S.A. 2C:21-19, charge and collect interest under a

revolving credit plan on outstanding unpaid indebtedness in the borrower's account under

c:\rpts\usury.doc

16

the plan at daily, weekly, monthly, annual or other periodic percentage rates as the

agreement governing the plan provides or as established in the manner provided in the

agreement governing the plan. If the applicable periodic percentage rate under the

agreement governing the plan is other than daily, interest may be calculated on an amount

not in excess of the average of outstanding unpaid indebtedness for the applicable billing

period, determined by dividing the total of the amounts of outstanding unpaid

indebtedness for each day in the applicable billing period by the number of days in the

billing period. If the applicable periodic percentage rate under the agreement governing

the plan is monthly, a billing period shall be deemed to be a month or monthly if the last

day of each billing period is on the same day of each month or does not vary by more than

four days therefrom.

Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the charging of interest on

the amount of any accrued interest remaining unpaid on the account.

L. 1985, c. 81.

17:3B-17. Interest.

[Notwithstanding the provisions of R.S. 31:1-1, a] A lender extending closed end

credit may, subject to the criminal usury provisions of N.J.S.A. 2C:21-19, charge and

collect interest with respect to a note or loan at daily, weekly, monthly, annual or other

periodic percentage rates established in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement,

except that the interest shall be calculated on a simple interest basis. In no instance shall

the precomputed interest method be used. Nothing in this section shall be construed to

authorize the charging of interest on any accrued interest remaining unpaid on the

account.

For purposes of this section, a year may be, but need not be, a calendar year and

shall be a period of 365 days. "Precomputed interest" means an amount equal to the whole

amount of interest payable on a loan for the period from the making of the loan to the date

scheduled by the terms of the loan for the repayment of the loan in full.

L. 1985, c. 81.

17:9A-53. Scope of article; definitions; interest.

A. In addition to such other loans which banks are authorized to make, a bank may

make secured and unsecured installment loans upon the terms and conditions prescribed

by this article, but this article shall not be construed as prescribing an exclusive method for

the making of loans which are payable in installments.

B. As used in this article:

(1) "Bank" means a banking institution as defined in section 1 (C. 17:9A-1) of this

act;

(2) "Installment loan" means a loan (1) which is required by its terms to be repaid

in two or more installments; (2) upon which interest is contracted for at a rate in excess of

c:\rpts\usury.doc

17

that authorized pursuant to R.S. 31:1-1; (3) the amount of which does not exceed the

amounts authorized by subsection D. of section 54 of this act (C. 17:9A-54D); and (4) the

final installment of which is payable not more than 12 years and 3 months subsequent to

the date upon which such loan is made. The terms "installment loan" and "installment

loans" as used in this article include both precomputed and nonprecomputed installment

loans unless otherwise expressly stated;

(3) (Deleted by amendment.)

(4) (Deleted by amendment.)

(5) "Person" means an individual, a partnership and an association;

(6) (Deleted by amendment.)

(7) (Deleted by amendment.)

(8) (Deleted by amendment.)

(9) "Actuarial method" means the method of applying payments made on a loan

between principal and interest pursuant to which a payment is applied first to accumulated

interest on the principal amount of the loan and the remainder is applied to the unpaid

principal balance of the loan in reduction thereof;

(10) "Precomputed interest" means an amount equal to the whole amount of

interest payable on an installment loan for the period from the making of the loan to the

date scheduled by the terms of the loan for the payment of the final installment;

(11) "Precomputed loan" means an installment loan which is evidenced by a note

the face amount of which consists of the aggregate of the principal amount of the loan so

evidenced, and theprecomputed interest thereon;

(12) "Nonprecomputed loan" means an installment loan which is evidenced by a

note the face amount of which consists solely of the principal amount of the loan so

evidenced;

(13) "Unpaid balance" of an installment loan means the aggregate of the following:

(i) The face amount of the note evidencing such loan;

(ii) All amounts paid by the bank and added to such loan as provided in paragraph

(2) of subsection A of section 55 [17:9A-55];

(iii) All interest accrued and unpaid;

(iv) Such further charges as the bank may make pursuant to law in protecting or

enforcing a security interest in any property securing the payment of such loan or

otherwise;

(v) In the case of precomputed loans, the amount of all late charges imposed

pursuant to section 55;

less the aggregate of the following:

(vi) All installment payments made in the case of a precomputed loan, or all

payments made in reduction of principal in the case ofnonprecomputed loan;

a

c:\rpts\usury.doc

18

(vii) All payments made on account of or in payment in full of any charges or

amounts referred to in subparagraphs (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) of this paragraph (13); and

(viii) In the case of a precomputed loan, the amount of the credit to which the

borrower is entitled pursuant to section 56 [17:9A-56];

(14) "Class I installment loan" means an installment loan which is unsecured, and

also means an installment loan which is secured by an interest in tangible or intangible

personal property;

(15) "Class II installment loan" means an installment loan which is secured by an

interest in real property.

C. [Notwithstanding the provisions of R.S. 31:1-1 or any other law to the

contrary, a] A bank may contract for and receive interest on installment loans calculated

according to the actuarial method, at a rate or rates agreed to by the bank and the

borrower. This subsection shall not limit or restrict the manner of contracting for the

interest charge, whether by way of add-on, discount or otherwise [, so long as the interest

rate does not exceed that permitted by this subsection]. In the case of a precomputed loan,

the interest may be computed on the assumption that all scheduled payments will be made

when due, and all scheduled installment payments made on a precomputed loan may be

applied as if they were received on their scheduled due dates. In the case of

nonprecomputed loans, all installment payments shall be applied no later than the next day,

other than a public holiday, after the date of receipt, and a day shall be counted as one

three-hundred-sixty-fifth of a year.

D. (Deleted by amendment.)

E. (Deleted by amendment.)

F. (Deleted by amendment.)

G. The commissioner may prepare and distribute to such banks as shall make a

request therefor, a schedule or schedules to be used in ascertaining precomputed interest,

or he may approve a subsisting schedule or schedules, and interest taken pursuant to such

c:\rpts\usury.doc

19

schedule or schedules shall constitute a complete compliance with this section. A copy of

such schedule or schedules, certified by the commissioner, shall be evidence in all courts

and places.

L. 1948, c. 67. Amended. L. 1950, c. 311; L. 1959, c. 180; L. 1965, c. 171; L.

1968, c. 436; L. 1973, c. 228; L. 1976, c. 128; L. 1981, c. 103.

17:9A-53.4. Educational loans.

[Notwithstanding the provisions of R.S. 31:1-1 or any other law to the contrary, a]

A banking institution may make educational loans and may charge and collect interest

thereon at a rate or rates agreed to by the banking institution and the borrower. Interest

shall be calculated according to the actuarial method, pursuant to which payments made

on the loan are applied first to accumulated interest on the principal amount of the loan

and the remainder applied to the unpaid principal balance of the loan in reduction thereof.

All payments shall be applied no later than the next day, other than a Sunday or a public

holiday, after the date of receipt, and a day shall be counted as one three-hundred-sixty-

fifth of a year. The note or other evidence of the loan may provide for an increase, or may

provide for a decrease, or both, in the rate of interest applicable to the loan. No increase

during the entire loan term shall result in an interest rate of more than 6% per annum over

the rate applicable initially, nor shall the rate be raised more than 3% per annum during

any 12-month period. The lender shall not be obligated to decrease the interest rate more

than 6% over the term of the loan, nor more than 3% per annum during any 12-month

period. If a rate increase is applied to the loan, the lender shall also be obligated to adopt

and implement uniform standards for decreasing the rate. If the note provides for the

possibility of an increase or decrease, or both, in the rate, that fact shall be clearly

described in plain language, in at least 8-point bold face type on the face of the note. No

rate increase shall take effect during the first 3 years of the term of the loan, or thereafter,

(a) unless at least 90 days prior to the effective date of the first such increase, or 30 days

prior to the effective date of any subsequent increase, a written notice has been mailed or

delivered to the borrower that clearly and conspicuously describes such increase, and (b)

unless at least 365 days have elapsed without any increase in the rate. No increase during

the entire loan term shall result in an interest rate of more than 6% per annum over the

rate applicable initially, nor shall the rate be raised more than 3% per annum during any

12-month period.

L. 1975, c. 287. Amended. L. 1981, c. 103.

17:9A-58. Exempt transactions.

Nothing in this article applies to

(1) any loan or extension of credit which a bank may make pursuant to any other

law of this State or any regulation promulgated pursuant to such law, nor does this article

apply to any loan or other extension of credit otherwise authorized or not prohibited by

law, or otherwise enforceable at law; or

c:\rpts\usury.doc

20

(2) [any loan which bears interest at a rate not in excess of a rate authorized

pursuant to R.S. 31:1-1 computed upon its unpaid balances; or eleted by amendment

]d

(3) any instrument or obligation, lawful upon its face, which is purchased or

discounted by a bank pursuant to paragraph (1) of section 25 [17:9A-25], and which

represents, evidences, or secures an existing indebtedness having its inception in a

transaction to which the bank is not a party; regardless whether such instrument or

obligation is acquired by the bank with or without rights of recourse against the person

from whom the bank obtains such instrument through such purchase or discount. A bank

shall not be deemed to be a party to a transaction within the meaning of this paragraph,

because prior to the inception of rights in any instrument, obligation or indebtedness

purchased or discounted by it, the bank approves the credit of any person liable for the

payment of such instrument, obligation or indebtedness at the request of the person who

supplies the consideration which supports the liability of any person to pay such

instrument, obligation or indebtedness.

L. 1948, c. 67. Amended. L. 1950, c. 311; L. 1968, c. 436; L. 1976, c. 128.

17:9A-59.6. Advance loan interest rates; annual fees.

A. [Notwithstanding the provisions of R.S. 31:1-1 or any other law to the

contrary, the] The rate or rates on advance loans shall be as agreed to by the bank and the

borrower. [Interest may be reckoned according to any method authorized by 31:1-1.]

R.S.

The contract may provide that the interest rate may be increased, or may be

decreased, or both, from time to time; provided, however, that no increase in interest shall

be effective unless: (a) at least 90 days prior to the effective date of the first such increase,

or 30 days prior to the effective date of any subsequent increase, a written notice has been

mailed or delivered to the borrower that clearly and conspicuously describes such change

and the indebtedness to which it applies and states that the incurrence by the borrower or

another person authorized by him of any further indebtedness under the plan to which the

agreement relates on or after the effective date of the increase specified in the notice shall

constitute acceptance of the increase and (b) either the borrower agrees in writing to the

increase or the borrower or another person authorized by him incurs such further

indebtedness on or after the effective date of the increase stated in the notice. The

provisions of this paragraph permitting an increase in a rate of interest shall not apply in

the case of an agreement which expressly prohibits changing of interest rates or which

provides limitations on changing of interest rates which are more restrictive than the

requirements of this paragraph. If the contract provides for the possibility of an increase or

decrease, or both, in the rate, that fact shall be clearly described in plain language, in at

least 8-point bold face type on the face of the contract.

B. For the purposes of this section, charges for premiums advanced by the bank

for credit life insurance, or credit accident and health insurance, or both, shall be treated as

part of the principal balance owing on an advance loan, but no such charge shall be

included in determining the maximum permissible indebtedness as limited by section 11 of

this act [17:9A-59.11].

c:\rpts\usury.doc

21

C. Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law to the contrary, a bank which

issues a credit card in connection with an advance loan contract in effect between the bank

and the borrower as authorized by this act [17:9A-59.1 et seq.] may charge the borrower a

fee not exceeding $15.00 per annum on an annual or monthly basis; except that, if under

the advance loan contract, the bank may lend the borrower an amount of $5,000.00 or

more, the bank may charge the borrower a fee not exceeding $50.00 per annum on an

annual or monthly basis. The charge so made (1) may be collected in advance, (2) shall be

in addition to and not in substitution of any other fee or charge authorized by this act, and

(3) shall not be deemed to be an interest charge.

L. 1959, c. 91. Amended. L. 1968, c. 64; L. 1981, c. 37; L. 1981, c. 103; L. 1984,

c. 225.

17:9A-59.27. Small business loans.

(a) [Notwithstanding the provisions of R.S. 31:1-1 or any other law to the

contrary, a] A bank may contract for and receive interest on a small business loan

calculated according to the actuarial method, at a rate or rates agreed on by the bank and

the borrower. This subsection shall not limit or restrict the manner of contracting for the

interest charge, whether by way of add-on, discount or otherwise[, so long as such charge

does not exceed the limitation imposed by this section]. In the case of a precomputed loan,

the interest charge may be computed on the assumption that all scheduled payments will

be made when due, and all scheduled installment payments made on a precomputed loan

may be applied as if they were received on their scheduled due dates. In the case of

nonprecomputed loans, all installment payments shall be applied no later than the next day,

other than a public holiday, after the date of receipt, and a day shall be counted as one

three-hundred-sixty-fifth of a year.

(b) (Deleted by amendment.)

L. 1964, c. 162. Amended. L. 1968, c. 36; L. 1972, c. 119; L. 1979, c. 319; L.

1981, c. 103.

17:9A-59.40. Loan to depositor in amount of and guaranteed by deposit.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a banking institution may contract

with a depositor for the loan of money in an amount not to exceed such depositor's

deposit and secured by a pledge of such deposit, upon such terms and conditions as may

be mutually agreed upon between the banking institution and such depositor[; provided,

however, that the rate of interest charged with respect to any such loan shall not exceed

the maximum permitted under the provisions of R.S. 31:1-1 or 2% in excess of the interest

rate then paid with respect to the deposit which secures such loan whichever is greater

].

L. 1977, c. 64.

c:\rpts\usury.doc

22

17:11C-5. Exemptions from licensing.

a. Depository institutions and insurance companies are exempt from licensing as

secondary mortgage lenders; but subsidiaries and service corporations of these institutions

or companies shall not be exempt.

b. A real estate broker or salesperson licensed in New Jersey pursuant to

R.S.45:15-1 et seq. is not required to obtain a license to negotiate a secondary mortgage

loan in the normal course of business as a real estate broker or salesman.

c. An attorney authorized to practice law in New Jersey is not required to obtain a

license to negotiate a secondary mortgage loan in the normal course of business as an

attorney.

d. Any person who makes one or two secondary mortgage loans in this State

during any calendar year [which are at an interest rate which is not in excess of the usury

rate in existence at the time the loan is made, as established in accordance with the law of

this State, and] on which the borrower has not agreed to pay, directly or indirectly, any

charge, cost, expense or any fee whatsoever, other than that interest, shall not be required

to obtain a license under this act.

e. Any employer who provides secondary mortgage loans to his employees as a

benefit of employment which are at an interest rate which is not in excess of the usury rate



Contact this candidate