Post Job Free

Resume

Sign in

Software Management

Location:
Ocean Shores, WA
Posted:
October 13, 2012

Contact this candidate

Resume:

REED F. SIMPSON

BS, MBA, CDP, REGISTERED INVESTMENT ADVISOR

Specialist in Computer and Internet Technology,

Software Project Management, Software Selection, Development and Implementation

Computer/Legal Consultants, Inc.

Ocean Shores, Washington

: 360-***-****

Seattle, Washington: 206-***-****

354 Harbor Court SE Suite 100

Ocean Shores, WA 98569

abo09x@r.postjobfree.com

Updated: Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Professional Summary

Mr. Simpson has over 39 years experience as a specialist in computer and Internet

technology with a focus on project management, software systems selection and

implementation, data base design and computer network systems architecture. He has been an

independent consultant to industry and the legal profession since 1980. Mr. Simpson is an

experienced legal consultant and expert witness with testimonial experience at deposition

and trial. A summary of Mr. Simpson s expertise includes:

Expertise

Computer Software Systems Implementation

Computer Software Selection

Software Implementation Project Management

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems

Department Of Defense Earned Value Management Systems

Internet Data Base Design and Implementation

Internet Technology Development and Deployment

Information Technology Planning & Execution

Internet Service Provider (ISP)

Relational Database Management Systems

Web Site Design

Web Site Operation and Management

Micro-Computer hardware Architectures

Embedded Microcomputer Systems

Network Systems Architecture

Operating Systems:

IBM OS/MVS, VM

IBM/Microsoft DOS

MAC/OS

Novell Netware

TRS/DOS

Unix

Windows

95, 98

Version 1, 2, 3, 3.11

WinCE

Windows 2000

Windows 2000 Advanced Server

Windows NT

Windows ME

Windows XP

Windows Vista

Data Base/Data Access:

BDAM

Btrieve

C-ISAM

Dbase

Filemaker

FoxPro

IBM DL/1

IBM IMS

IBM DB2

Indexed Sequential Access Method (ISAM)

Informix

Lotus Approach

Magic PC

Microcomputer Data Base System (MDBS)

Microsoft Access

Microsoft SQL Server

Oracle

Paradox

Progress

QPro4

Rbase (Microrim)

Various Flat File Databases

Programming Languages:

Access Basic

Active Server Pages (ASP)

Basic

C, C++, et al.

Cobol

Fortran

Front Page

Expressions Web

J Script

HTML/DHTML, et al.

Java

Machine and Assembly Language - Various processors

Numerous macro and command languages

Pascal

Perl

VB Script

Visual Basic, et al.

Visual Basic for Applications (VBA), et al.

Scripting languages (various)

Hardware:

Engineering workstations - many manufacturers

IBM Mainframe

Network server - many manufacturers

Multi Processor

High Reliability

Raid Array Storage

PC Workstations - many manufacturers

Networking:

Arcnet

Ethernet

Communications - Dial-up, ISDN, Leased line, T-1

Router, Firewall, Switches, Hubs.

Network Data Backup - DLT High Capacity Library.

Industry Applications

Aerospace

Program Management Systems

Earned Value Management Systems

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems

Material Control

MRP

Shop Floor Control

Data Collection

Financial

Budgeting

Estimating

Quality Assurance

Commercial Banking Systems

Computer Aided Design

Computer Aided Manufacturing

Fire District Information Systems

Consumer Goods Packaging and Distribution

County Election Systems

County Public Information Publication (Internet)

County Welfare Data Base Information System

Engineering Time-Sharing Systems

Hospital Pharmacy Accounting

Law Office Automation

Newspaper Publishing

Property Mapping Systems

Medical Billing

Solid Waste Billing and Accounting

Stock Price Technical Analysis

TV Production Company Cost and Royalty Accounting

Web Site Development/Hosting and Content Management

Education

B. S. - Business Administration - California State Polytechnic University

M.B.A California State Polytechnic University

Masters Thesis: Technical Analysis of Stock Market Trends

Post Graduate-Mathematics - California State University - Los Angeles

Post Graduate-Quantitative Analysis - UCLA

Post Graduate-University Of West Los Angeles Law School

Programming Languages

Computer Operating Systems

Computer Networking

Computer Hardware

Applications Software

Professional Experience

From:

1980Computer/Legal Consultants, Inc. and Chelsea Group, Inc.

To: Present

Position: Vice President

Computer/Legal Consulting, Inc. focuses on consulting in the areas of project management

and litigation support, including expert witness in computer issues.

The Chelsea Group Inc., focuses on consulting requirements involving computer management.

Responsibilities include advising clients in the planning, selection, acquisition and

installation of computerized systems to support business needs. The Chelsea Group has

served clients in many industry groups.

Specific areas of expertise include:

Internet web site development, maintenance and operation

Web page design, navigation structure, link management and data file/content delivery and

Internet Data Base design, development and integration with "data driven" Web sites

Internet email server design, setup, installation and operation

Internet user setup, system security, performance and "spam" management

Computer hardware/software selection, acquisition, contract negotiation and installation

management

Computer network systems design, specification, selection, acquisition and support

Business contract strategy and negotiation

Management Control Systems Planning/Evaluation

MIS long-range planning and execution

Systems design/programming of manufacturing, financial, project management, quantitative

analysis and decision support systems

Business planning and expansion strategy

Financial Analysis and Cost control strategy

From: 1973 HR Textron, Inc. - An Aerospace division of Textron, Inc.

To: 1980

Position:

Director, Management Information Services

General Manager - Apco Products Division - Aerospace Fuel and Pneumatic Division

Director, Long Range Planning and Corporate Development

Director, Management Information Services - Responsibilities included:

Division data processing operations

Systems development and planning

Engineering design computing systems

Division print shop

Division data base development

Support other Textron Divisions with Program/Project management systems requirements.

Textron Computer Technology Consultant

General Manager - Apco Products Division - Aerospace Fuel and Pneumatic Division -

Responsibilities included:

Profit and Loss responsibility for division operations.

Operations included Marketing, Engineering, Manufacturing and Finance.

Director, Long Range Planning and Corporate Development - Responsibilities included:

Division Strategic Planning

Growth strategy development and coordination

Division acquisition and divestiture strategy

Product and service group charters

Technology Assessment

Attend Classified U.S. Military briefings

From: 1972Coca Cola Bottling Company Of Los Angeles

To: 1973

Position: Manager, Corporate Data Processing

Responsible for Corporate data processing systems development, computer operations,

software/hardware selection and implementation..

From: 1965 General Dynamics, Pomona Division

To: 1973

Position:

Manager, Financial and Program Management Systems

Manager, Financial and Program Management Systems - Responsible for:

Managing the planning, development, programming and support of all Pomona Division

Financial Systems.

Planning, development, programming and support of all Pomona Division Program Management

Systems.

Assist other General Dynamics Divisions with Project Management systems projects

Special project assignment to develop data base systems requirements for Pomona Aerospace

Division Operations.

Litigation Support Experience

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Aircraft Accident

Case Name: American Airlines v. Honeywell, Jeppesen. Aircraft Accident of December 20,

1995 near Cali Columbia - American Airlines Flight 965. Ref: [400]

Jurisdiction: Florida-Southern District

Client: American Airlines

Nature Of Case: Airline accident with issues concerning the flight control computer, the

data base contained within and the many processes involved in creating the data base.

Several companies and many computer systems are involved.

Services Provided: Consulting Technical expert.

Analyze Flight management software development, flight data base contents and

development. Review electronic records including email, CDROM, data base backup, problem

logs and certification data. Analyze Flight Management Computer software version history

and program source code.

Law Firm: Sullivan, Johnson & Manfredi-Los Angeles, CA

Disposition: Complete June 2000.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Class Action

Case Name: Miller - Class Action v. Bank Of America Ref: [450]

Jurisdiction: San Francisco Superior Court

Client: Miller (Class Action)

Nature Of Case: Miller (Class Action) claims that Bank Of America did not properly

process Checking accounts with Social Security Direct Deposit activity. The class-action

case, filed 5 1/2 years ago, centers on allegations that Bank of America collected some

customer service fees by siphoning money from direct deposit accounts set up to receive

Social Security benefits.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Declaration.

Testimony at Trial.

Damages Expert

Designated Technical Expert concerning production of computerized account records.

Design, build and operate relational data base system to analyze 50 million records

produced in electronic form by Bank Of America.

Law Firm: The Sturdevant Law Firm-SF

Disposition: Complete February, 2004.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: Department 56 v. Arthur Anderson Ref: [500]

Jurisdiction: Minnesota, Hennepin County

Client: Arthur Anderson LLP

Nature Of Case: Department 56 claims that Arthur Anderson committed fraud while assisting

Department 56 in the selection and implementation of J. D. Edwards ERP software system.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Litigation Support.

Review software selection process. Review project management. Review policy implications

of new software system implementation.

Law Firm: Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott-Chicago, IL

Disposition: Complete February 2002

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: Solution Beacon V. [Name Withheld] Ref: [512]

Jurisdiction: AAA-Portland Oregon

Client: Solution Beacon LLC

Nature Of Case: [Name Withheld] Corporation claims that Solution Beacon failed to

sucessfully implement the Oracle eBusiness software for its divisions. The implementation

involved multiple divisions in several countries.

Services Provided: Designated Expert

Expert Report

Testimony at Trial

Law Firm: Fafinski Mark & Johnson

Disposition: Complete January 2012

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: All Pro Sound v. Netsirk Technologies Ref: [525]

Jurisdiction: Florida Circuit Court - Escambia County

Client: All Pro Sound

Nature Of Case: All Pro purchased SAP Business One software and contracted with Netsirk

to advice All Pro on the selection and to install the SAP software. All Pro claims that

Netsirk never installed SAP software thatr satisfied the business needs of All Pro.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Law Firm: McDonald Fleming Moorhead

Disposition: Complete

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Systems Development

Case Name: Tri Valley Growers v. Oracle Corporation Ref: [550]

Jurisdiction: San Francisco Superior Court

Client: Tri-Valley Growers

Nature Of Case: Tri Valley Growers purchased a Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG) software

system from Oracle Corporation. TVG alleges that the software was defective, did not meet

its needs and was never completely installed.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Deposition Testimony.

Consulting Technical Expert.

Review and evaluate Oracle management decision making process, development planning and

project management.

Law Firm: Dorsey & Whitney-Minneapolis, MN

Disposition: Complete January 2002

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Patent Infringement

Case Name: Orion IP V. Staples, Inc., et al Ref: [600]

Jurisdiction: US District - Marshall TX.

Client: Toyota, Harley Davidson, Home Depot

Nature Of Case: Orion IP Claims Infringement of U.S. Patent 5,367,627 COMPUTER-ASSISTED

PARTS SALES METHOD - Johnson

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Deposition Testimony

Law Firm: Vinson & Elkins, McDermott Will & Emery, Fulbright & Jaworski

Disposition: Complete March 2006

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Service Mark Infringement

Case Name: Farmers Group, Inc. v. Guerrero Ref: [650]

Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court-Washington - Eastern District

Client: Guerrero, Rene

Nature Of Case: Farmers Insurance Group alleges that an Internet gripe site maintained by

Guerrero (1) Service Mark Infringement. (2) Unfair Competition. (3) Service Mark Dilution.

(4) Unfair Competition And Unfair Or Deceptive Acts.

Services Provided: Designated Expert

Expert Report

Law Firm: Preston, Gates & Ellis-Spokane

Disposition: Complete January 2006

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: Westlake Chemical Corporation and Westlake Management Services, Inc. v. Oracle

Corporation, Experio Solutions Corporation and Grant Thornton LLP. Ref: [750]

Jurisdiction: Texas-District Court of Harris County

Client: Westlake Chemical Corporation

Nature Of Case: Westlake claims that Oracle, Experio and Grant Thornton were to blame for

the failed implementation of Oracle eProcurement and SAP Connector integration software.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Law Firm: Doyle, Restrepo, Harvin & Robbins-Houston

Disposition: Complete April 2003

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: Pioneer-Standard Electronics, Inc. v. CAP Gemini America, Inc. Ref: [800]

Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court-Ohio-Northern District

Client: CAP Gemini America, Inc.

Nature Of Case: Pioneer claims that CAP Gemini contributed to a failed IMI ESS - Oracle

Financial Software Selection and Integration. Pioneer Standard claims software was

defective, did not meet its needs and was implemented improperly.

Services Provided: Designated Technical Expert.

Designated Damages Expert.

Expert Report.

Deposition Testimony.

Testimony at Trial

Law Firm: Shearman & Sterling-NYC

Disposition: Complete December 2003.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: Berkshire Blanket, Inc. V. Independent Computer Consulting Group, Inc. Ref:

[825]

Jurisdiction: US District Court - Mass

Client: Independent Computer Consulting Group, Inc.

Nature Of Case: Berkshire claims that Independant Computer Consulting Group, Inc. failed

to implement Lawson ERP system within cost and schedule satisfactory to Berkshire.

Services Provided: Designated Expert

Expert Report

Law Firm: Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin - Philadelphia

Disposition: Complete August 2010

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Systems Development

Case Name: Colorado Department of Higher Education - Colorado Student Loan Program v.

Ratheon E-Systems, Inc. Ref: [850]

Jurisdiction: Colorado - Denver District Court

Client: Colorado Department of Higher Education

Nature Of Case: Failed software development. Colorado Deportment of Higher Education

claims that Ratheon failed to develop and deliver a system to process student loans for

the state.

Services Provided: Designated Expert

Expert Report

Law Firm: Hogan & Hartson, LLC.

Disposition: Completed September 2008

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: Priority Healthcare Corporation v. Deloitte & Touche LLP. Ref: [900]

Jurisdiction: Florida Circuit - Ninth District

Client: Deloitte & Touche LLP

Nature Of Case: Priority claims faulty performance by Deloitte during a Computer Software

Selection and implementation involving Oracle software and Custom developed applications.

Services Provided: Designated Expert

Expert Analysis

Law Firm: Holland & Knight-Miami

Disposition: Complete September 2005

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Warehouse Software Implementation

Case Name: TigerDirect, Inc. and Systemax V. Manhattan Associates, Inc. Ref: [950]

Jurisdiction: Florida-Southern District

Client: TigerDirect, Inc. and Systemax, Inc.

Nature Of Case: Manhattan Associates contracted with TigerDirect for the purchase and

installation of a Warehouse Management System designed to handle TigerDirect high order

and shipping volumes. Tiger claims that the Manhattan Warehouse for Microsoft Windows

system was not capable of supporting the TiderDirect warehouse operation after the system

went live.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Deposition Testimony

Law Firm: Holland & Knight - Tampa

Disposition: Complete February 2007

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Systems Development

Case Name: Evangelical Lutheran Church in America Board of Pensions V. Spherion Pacific

Workforce Ref: [1000]

Jurisdiction: US District Court-Minnesota

Client: Evangelical Lutheran Church in America Board of Pensions

Nature Of Case: The Board of Pensions contracted with Spherion to develop a software

system to replace a legacy system. The Board of Pensions claims that Spherion produced a

software system that was of little or no value and was a failed software implementation.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Law Firm: Dorsey & Whitney-Minneapolis, MN

Disposition: Complete May 2006.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Systems Development

Case Name: U.S. Bank National Association (Multi Service Corporation) v. PerfectStop

Partners Pier to Pier v.U.S. Bank (MO. State Court) Ref: [1050]

Jurisdiction: AAA Houston, TX

Client: US Bank

Nature Of Case: PerfectStop developed an internet based computer system to link aircraft

operators with Fixed Base Operators to coordinate trip logistics. US Bank claims that

PerfectStop system was never operational.

Services Provided: Designated Expert

Expert Analysis/Designation

Trial Testimony

Law Firm: Dorsey & Whitney-Minneapolis, MN

Disposition: Complete March 2009

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Systems Development

Case Name: The Insurance House Inc. v. Insurance Data Processing, Inc. Ref: [1100]

Jurisdiction: US District Court Georgia Northern District

Client: Insurance Data Processing

Nature Of Case: Insurance House claims breach of contract by Insurance Data Processing

for the development of a computer system.

Services Provided: Designated Expert

Expert Report

Deposition Testimony

Law Firm: Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersall-Philla, PA

Disposition: Completed August 2010

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: Answerthink v. Del Monte Fresh Produce Company Ref: [1150]

Jurisdiction: Florida Circuit Court-Miami

Client: Del Monte Fresh Produce Company

Nature Of Case: Answerthink was retained by DelMonte to implement Oracle applications

software in the United States and several other countries. DelMonte claims that

Answerthink materially breached the agreements.

Services Provided: Designated Expert

Hearing Testimony

Expert Report

Deposition Testimony

Law Firm: Holland & Knight-Miami

Disposition: Completed May 2011

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Computer Hardware/Software Development

Case Name: Hewlett-Packard Company V. Factory Mutual Insurance Company Ref: [1250]

Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court - NY

Client: Factory Mutual Insurance

Nature Of Case: HP claims significant loss due to sabotage by a former employee. Factory

Mutual disputes the loss claim.

Services Provided: Consulting Technical expert.

Law Firm: Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi

Disposition: Complete May 2004

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Patent Infringement

Case Name: Abstrax, Inc. v. Dell, Inc. and Gateway, Inc. Ref: [1300]

Jurisdiction: US District Court - Eastern District Marshall Division

Client: Dell, Inc.

Nature Of Case: Abstrax claims patent infringement by Dell of patent 6,240,328 entitled

entitled Manufacturing Method for Assembling Products by Generating and Scheduling

Dynamically Assembly Instructions

Services Provided: Designated Non-Infringement Expert

Expert Report

Deposition Testimony

Law Firm: Vinson & Elkins-Austin, TX

Disposition: Complete November 2009

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Employment Age/Other Discrimination

Case Name: US Equal Opportunity Commission v. Rodeway (YRC) Ref: [1310]

Jurisdiction: Federal District Court - Chicago

Client: US Equal Opportunity Commission - Rodeway

Nature Of Case: US EEOC claims that Rodeway engaged in discriminatory practices when

assigning loading and freight movement to individual employees.

Services Provided: Court Designated Neutral Expert - Data analysis/Discovery and Data B

ase construction

Law Firm: US EEOC - Morgan, Lewis Bockius

Disposition: Completed August 2010

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: Computer Horizons v. Spearhead Consultants and SAP America, Inc. Ref: [1400]

Jurisdiction: New York-Supreme Court - NY County

Client: Computer Horizons Corp.

Nature Of Case: Computer Horizons purchased SAP software system which was to be

customized and installed by Spearhead Systems. Computer Horizons claims software was

defective, did not meet its needs and was implemented improperly.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Consulting Technical Expert.

Evaluate system requirements, technical structure, data interface, data base structure

and system integration structure.

Law Firm: Proskauer Rose-New York City, NY

Disposition: Complete March 2001.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Theft Of Software Trade Secrets

Case Name: United Computer Systems, Inc. v. AT&T and Lucent Technologies, Inc. Ref:

[1500]

Jurisdiction: California-American Arbitration Association-LA

Client: AT&T and Lucent Technologies, Inc

Nature Of Case: Computer software system, claims of capabilities and performance.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Testimony at Trial.

Analysis of computer system, source code and underlying file structure and operation.

Review data base structure.

Law Firm: Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe-Los Angeles, CA

Disposition: Complete June 1999.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Theft Of Software Trade Secrets

Case Name: G5 Technologies, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation Ref:

[1550]

Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court - NY

Client: G5 Technologies

Nature Of Case: G5 claims that IBM used G5 Internet E Commerce Trade Secrets and

Confidential Information for Its own benefit and to the detriment of G5. G5 claims that

IBM commercialized G5's VCMS as embodied in IBM's Websphere products.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Law Firm: Garvey Schubert Barer-New York

Disposition: Complete December 2005

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Systems Development

Case Name: PHARMACEUTICAL RETURNS SERVICE v. PHARMA LOGISTICS, LTD Ref: [1600]

Jurisdiction: US District Court - Illinois

Client: Pharmaceutical Returns Service

Nature Of Case: Pharma developed a computer system to process oudated drugs for return to

manufacturers. Pharaceutical Returns Service claims that Pharma used it's trade secrets to

develop the system.

Services Provided: Designated Expert

Expert Report

Law Firm: Bryan Cave - Chicago

Disposition: Completed June 2009

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: University of Quebec v. SAP Canada Inc. Ref: [1700]

Jurisdiction: Canada-Montreal Arbitration Tribunal

Client: University of Quebec

Nature Of Case: Failed SAP software implementation claimed by University of Quebec.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Testimony at Trial.

Law Firm: Woods & Partners-Montreal, Canada

Disposition: Complete August 2003

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: State Of Arkansas V. SAP Public Services, Inc. Ref: [1750]

Jurisdiction: Arkansas Circuit Court

Client: State Of Arkansas

Nature Of Case: The State Of Arkansas contracted with SAP Public Services, Inc. for the

purchase of computer software. The State Of Arkansas claims that SAP Public Services

failed to provide an integrated Financial Management computer software to handle unique

Public Sector requirements.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Law Firm: State Of Arkansas - Attorney General

Disposition: Complete August 2008

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Medical Billing Software Implementation

Case Name: State Of Iowa vs. InfoSys, Inc. Ref: [1850]

Jurisdiction: Iowa District Court-Polk County

Client: InfoSys, Inc.

Nature Of Case: The State Of Iowa Department of Human Services claims that InfoSys

provided a flawed system to perform Medical billing and processing.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Law Firm: Holland & Knight-Chicago

Disposition: Completed January 2005

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: State Medicaid Software System Implementation

Case Name: Texas Department Of Health v. EDS-National Heritage Insurance Company Ref:

[1900]

Jurisdiction: AAA - Dallas, TX

Client: EDS-National Heritage Insurance Company

Nature Of Case: Texas Department Of Health claims that National Health/EDS improperly

billed development and other costs. Determination of substantial completion of installed

computer system. Status and significance of CMS audit of State Medicare/Medicaid System.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Deposition Testimony.

Trial Testimony

Law Firm: Hughes & Luce-Dallas

Disposition: Complete October 2004.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: Ocean Garden Products, Inc. v. IBM Global Services, a Division of

International Business Machines Corporation Ref: [2000]

Jurisdiction: US District Court-California Southern District

Client: IBM Corporation

Nature Of Case: Ocean Garden Products claims Breach of Contract and Fraud by IBM during

the selection and implementation of the QAD ERP software to replace a non-Y2K compliant

legacy system.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Technology consultant.

Law Firm: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges-Los Angeles, CA

Disposition: Complete August 2003

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Web Site Development

Case Name: Uncle Henry s Inc. v. Plaut Consulting Inc. and Edgewing, a Division of Plaut

Consulting, Inc. Ref: [2100]

Jurisdiction: US District Court - Maine

Client:

Plaut Consulting, Inc.

Nature Of Case: Uncle Henry's claims Breach of Contract for the development of a

classified advertising eCommerce Web Site using a Microsoft development environment.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Testimony at Trial.

Internet Technology consultant.

Law Firm: Lynch, Brewer, Hoffman & Sands-Boston, MA and Verrill & Dana - Portland Me

Disposition: Complete April 2003.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Systems Development

Case Name: La Touraine, Inc. v. Navisite, Inc., Formerly known as Jupiter Hosting, Inc.

Ref: [2125]

Jurisdiction:

American Arbitration Association-San Francisco

Client: La Touraine, Inc.

Nature Of Case: La Touraine contracted with Navisite to develop an Internet website

Content Management System (CMS) and to host a number of websites operated by LaTouraine.

LaTouraine claims that the CMS developed by Navisite was incomplete and had been

misrepresented. LaTouraine claims that Navisite shut down LaTouraine websites.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report

Deposition Testimony

Trial Testimony

Law Firm: Asaro Keagy

Disposition: Complete - January 2009

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Class Action

Case Name: Cornn, et. Al- Class Action. v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Ref: [2150]

Jurisdiction: California-Northern District

Client: Class Action Plaintiffs

Nature Of Case: Plaintiffs claim that UPS failed to pay them for various classes of time

worked.

Services Provided: Expert consultant

Damages Data Base Expert

Technical expert concerning production of computerized work and payroll records. Design,

load and operate relational data base system to process and analyze 400 million records

produced in electronic form.

Law Firm: Kershaw, Cutter, Ratinoff & York

Disposition: Complete January 2007

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: Styling Technology Corporation v. Arthur Anderson LLP et. al. Ref: [2200]

Jurisdiction:

Arizona-Superior Court Maricopa County

Client: Styling Technology Corporation

Nature Of Case: Styling Technology retained Arthur Anderson to design and implement

Oracle financial systems. Styling claims that Arthur Anderson failed to deliver in a

timely manner and when delivered, the system failed to work.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Analysis of Oracle system selection and implementation.

Law Firm: Grant & Eisenhofer

Disposition: Complete December 2003.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Copyright Infringement

Case Name: Medinformatix, Inc. V. AcerMed, Inc. Ref: [2250]

Jurisdiction:

JAMS - Los Angeles California

Client: AcerMED Inc.

Nature Of Case: Mediformatix claims that Acermed infringed it's Copyright on a Medical

Office management system developed by Medinformatix when AcerMed developed a competing

system. Medinformatix also claims that Acermed misappropriated its trade secrets relating

to the Microsoft SQL data base used by the AcerMed system.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Deposition Testimony

Trial Testimony

Review and evaluate Microsoft SQL data bases used by both systems.

Law Firm: Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth-Newport Beach, CA

Disposition: Complet March 2007.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: ChartOne, Inc. v. Netcube Systems, Inc. Ref: [2300]

Jurisdiction:

AAA - San Jose

Client: ChartOne, Inc.

Nature Of Case: Failed software implementation. ChartOne alleges that Netcube failed to

fulfill its obligations during an engagement involving PeopleSoft computer software.

Services Provided: Designated Expert

Law Firm: Miller Morton Caillat & Nevis-SJ

Disposition: Complete June 2004

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Systems Development

Case Name: Computer Business Applications, Inc. v. Melville Corporation Ref: [2400]

Jurisdiction: California-Central District

Client: Computer Business Applications, Inc. - Plaintiff./Cross Defendant

Nature Of Case: Contracts dispute involving claims that a merchandising software system

was defective.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Deposition Testimony.

Testimony at Trial.

Review system technology, implementation issues, possible defects, corrective efforts,

costs and impacts.

Law Firm: Perkins Coie-Los Angeles, CA

Disposition: Complete September 1994.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Class Action

Case Name: Mulligan - Class Action v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company Ref: [2450]

Jurisdiction: California Superior Court-Alameda County

Client: Mulligan - Class Rep.

Nature Of Case: PacBell is accused of erroneously charging Wire Pro inside wiring

maintenance charges

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Design relational data base to collect and analyze information for 7 million users of the

PacBell Wirepro service.

Law Firm: The Sturdevant Law Firm-SF

Disposition: Complete June 2004.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Patent Infringement

Case Name: DE Technologies, Inc. v. Dell, Inc. Ref: [2500]

Jurisdiction: US Virginia - Wester District

Client: DE Tech

Nature Of Case: De Tech claims infringement of United States Patents Nos. 6,460,020 and

6,845,364 ("the '020 Patent" and "the '364 Patent" respectively) both entitled "Universal

Shopping Center for International Operation."

Services Provided: Damages Data base Consultant.

Consultant for acquisition of damages data from Dell data bases. Create damages data

base.

Law Firm: Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi

Disposition: Complete - December 2006

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Patent Infringement

Case Name: Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company v. Dell, Inc., Hewlett-Packard

Company and Gateway, Inc. Ref: [2550]

Jurisdiction: US District - Marshall TX.

Client:

Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company

Nature Of Case: Intergraph claims infringement of it's Patent 4,899,275 entitled Cache-

MMU System; Patent 4,933,835 entitled Apparatus for Maintaining Consistency of a Cache

Memory with a Primary Memory and Patent 5,091,846 entitled Cache Providing Caching/Non-

Caching Write-Through and Copyback Modes

Services Provided: Damages data base data verification consultant

Law Firm: Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi

Disposition: Complete August 2004.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Class Action

Case Name: Harp - Class Action v. Quest Communications Ref: [2600]

Jurisdiction: Oregon-Circuit Court Multnomah County

Client: Harp - Class Rep.

Nature Of Case: Quest Communications is accused of erroneously charging roaming charges

for Cellular phone calls.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Damage Calculations From Computerized Records

Law Firm: Northwest Lawfirm-Portland, OR

Disposition: Complete April 2005

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Copyright Infringement

Case Name: IEA Software, Inc. and Community ISP, Inc. v. Whole ISP, Brian Krabach; Todd

Meyers Ref: [2650]

Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court-Washington - Eastern District

Client: Community ISP

Nature Of Case: Community ISP alleges Copyright Infringement regarding software program,

data bases and text manuals.

Services Provided: Designated Expert

Expert Report

Law Firm: Preston, Gates & Ellis-Spokane

Disposition: Complete January 2005

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: Reference Pathology Services, Inc. v. Soft Computer Consultants Ref: [2800]

Jurisdiction: Florida-American Arbitration Association-Tampa

Client: Reference Pathology Services, Inc.

Nature Of Case: Failed Medical Laboratory Software implementation. Issues included system

architecture, system functional capabilities, data conversion, system bugs and system

reliability.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Deposition Testimony.

Testimony at Trial.

Law Firm: Trenam, Scharf, Barkin, Fry, O'Neill & Mullis-Tampa

Disposition: Complete February 2003

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Theft Of Software Trade Secrets

Case Name: Move Management, Inc. v. Relocation Management Worldwide, Inc. and Armstrong

Transfer and Storage Company, Inc. Ref: [2900]

Jurisdiction: Colorado-Jefferson County

Client: Move Management, Inc.

Nature Of Case: Move Management claims that Relocation Management used Move Management

Trade Secrets during the development of a competing Web Site.

Services Provided: Neutral Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Deposition Testimony.

Review and compare Web sites, source code and SQL data bases.

Law Firm: Brownstein Hyatt & Farber-Denver; Schwartz & Goldberg-Denver; Wyatt, Tarrant &

Combs-Memphis

Disposition: Complete December 2003.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Support Services

Case Name: Verizon Business Network Services, Inc. v. AT & T Corporation Ref: [2950]

Jurisdiction:

AAA - New York City

Client: Verizon Business Networks

Nature Of Case: Verizon claims that AT & T wrongfully terminated it's contract to provide

support for networks operated by At & T.

Services Provided: Designated Expert

Law Firm: DLA Piper

Disposition: Complete- March 2008

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: Parrot Ice Products v. Oracle Corporation Ref: [3000]

Jurisdiction: Texas-District Court of Harris County

Client:

Parrot Ice Products, Inc.

Nature Of Case: Failed software selection. Parrot Ice claims that Oracle Corporation

represented that the Oracle applications software could be used to operate the business.

Parrot Ice claims that the software sold to Parrot was not applicable to its business and

could not be used.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Deposition Testimony.

Law Firm: Doyle, Restrepo, Harvin & Robbins-Houston

Disposition: Complete July 2005

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: Farouk Systems, Inc. v. Oracle Corporation Ref: [3050]

Jurisdiction: US District Court Houston Division

Client:

Farouk Systems, Inc.

Nature Of Case: Farouk Systems claims that Oracle sold a defective ERP software system.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Technical consultant.

Law Firm: Simpson & Brenner-San Diego

Disposition: Complete October, 2004

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: False Advertising

Case Name: Crystal Decisions, Inc. v. Actuate Corporation Ref: [3150]

Jurisdiction: US Northern District-San Jose Division

Client: Crystal Decisions, Inc.

Nature Of Case: Crystal Decisions is seeking a Preliminary Injunction to bar Actuate

Corporation from making false advertising claims.

Services Provided: Designated Expert. Expert Report.

Testimony at Trial.

Product capability evaluation. Expert presentation. Expert Declarations.

Law Firm: Hopkins & Carley-San Jose

Disposition: Complete July 2002

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Copyright Infringement

Case Name: Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. And Nissan North America, Inc. v. Nissan Computer

Corporation Ref: [3250]

Jurisdiction: California-Central District

Client: Nissan Computer Corporation

Nature Of Case: Nissan Computer Corporation operates an Internet website under the

registered domain name of nissan.com. Nissan Motor Co. claims Copyright dilution by Nissan

Computer Corporation due to its use of the nissan.com domain.

Services Provided: Designated expert.

Expert report.

Consulting Technical Expert.

Review and analyze website traffic logs and statistics.

Law Firm: Techmark-San Jose, CA

Disposition: Complete November, 2002.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Theft Of Software Trade Secrets

Case Name: H&S Rehabilitative Treatment Services, Inc. v. da Vinci Motion Graphics Ref:

[3350]

Jurisdiction: OK-Oaklahoma County District Court

Client: da Vinci Motion Graphics

Nature Of Case: H&S claims misappropriation of trade secrets and violation of a Non-

Disclosure Agreement by da Vinci.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Deposition Testimony.

Testimony at Trial.

Review features and functions of party's software products.

Law Firm: Klinge, Brown & Roberts-Oklahoma City, OK

Disposition: Complete April 2002.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Theft Of Software Trade Secrets

Case Name: Computer Management Consultants, Inc. vs. Computer Information Specialist,

Inc. Ref: [3400]

Jurisdiction: Circuit Court - Tampa Florida

Client:

Computer Management Consultants, Inc.

Nature Of Case: Computer Management Consultants entered into a contract to sell computer

software source/object code to Computer Information Specialist. Computer Management

Consultants claims that Computer Information Specialist breached the contract by not

completing the purchase and using knowledge gained to develop a comparable system.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Deposition Testimony.

Law Firm: Trenam, Scharf, Barkin, Fry, O'Neill & Mullis-Tampa

Disposition: Complete April 2006

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Theft Of Software Trade Secrets

Case Name: Data Direct Networks, Inc. v. Transoft Technology Corporation Ref: [3500]

Jurisdiction: Superior Court, State of California - County of Santa Barbara

Client: Data Direct Networks, Inc.

Nature Of Case: Computer Software Trade Secrets. Data Direct claims theft of trade

secrets in the form of computer software for the control of Storage Area Network (SAN)

software and business plans by Transoft.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Technical consultant.

Analysis of electronic discovery materials. Review and analysis of programming source

code, email (including attachments) and system backup data files.

Law Firm: Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe-Los Angeles, CA

Disposition: Complete January 2000.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Systems Development

Case Name: FlexiInternational Software, Inc. - Claimant v. Dataworks, Epicor and Platinum

Software Ref: [3600]

Jurisdiction: California-American Arbitration Association-SF

Client:

FlexiInternational Software, Inc.

Nature Of Case: Parties entered into a software license/development agreement. Parties

dispute software development process, features implemented and development schedule.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Deposition Testimony.

Review project documents, evaluate management of project and contract performance.

Law Firm: The Banchero Law Firm-San Francisco, CA

Disposition: Complete February 2001.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Theft Of Software Trade Secrets

Case Name: Multico Rating Systems v. (Name withheld by request) Ref: [3650]

Jurisdiction: AAA-Washington State

Client: Names Confidential

Nature Of Case: Trade Secrets. Multico claims that (confidential) used proprietary

information to develop competing insurance rating software.

Services Provided: Designated Expert

Expert Report.

Law Firm: Preston, Gates & Ellis-Spokane

Disposition: Complete January 2005

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Copyright Infringement

Case Name: National Airmotive v. Oracle Corp., Avanti Systems, Inc., James Greenwood and

Gregory Stachnick Ref: [3700]

Jurisdiction: California-Northern District

Client: National Airmotive Corporation, Rolls Royce

Nature Of Case: National owns rights to computer source code. Oracle acquired code via.

Former employee. National claims that Oracle is marketing a computer system which

incorporated its intellectual property.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Program/system source code analysis.

Law Firm: Anderson Kill & Olick - New York City, NY

Disposition: Complete June 2001.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: ERP Software Implementation

Case Name: Large Internet DSL Provider v. International Consulting Firm Ref: [3800]

Jurisdiction: na

Client: Internet DSL Service Provider

Nature Of Case: International Consulting Form retained to select, modify, install and

implement "back office" systems to support DSL service requirements.

Services Provided: Technical Expert.

Expert Computer Consulting and analysis. Evaluate project management system, reporting

and status of contract deliverables. Obtain and review machine readable project files,

documents and reporting systems. Systems included Siebel, Portal, Vitria and Oracle data

bases.

Law Firm: Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth-Newport Beach, CA

Disposition: Complete January 2002

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: eCommerce Web Site Development

Case Name: Solv Corporation v. PurchasePro.com Ref: [3900]

Jurisdiction:

American Arbitration Association - Las Vegas, Nevada

Client:

Solv Corporation - Altlana, GA

Nature Of Case: Solv developed software for PurchasePro.com. Solv alleges that PurchasPro

wrongfully terminated contract for Internet eCommerce web site development.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Litigation Support.

Review program development standards.

Law Firm: Weil & Lee-Anaheim, CA

Disposition: Complete September 2001.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Package Implementation

Case Name: SS&C v. AF Investmentos Ref: [3950]

Jurisdiction:

AAA Arbitration - New York

Client: AF Investmentos

Nature Of Case: Portfolio Management software purchased by AF Investmentos was defective.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Consulting Technical Expert.

Evaluate system requirements, technical representations and data base architecture.

Review and evaluate project management system, reporting, status and performance.

Law Firm: Dorsey & Whitney-Minneapolis, MN

Disposition: Complete February 2001

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Package Implementation

Case Name: New England Air Systems, Inc. v. ePartners, Inc. and Solomon Software, Inc.

Ref: [4100]

Jurisdiction: MA-State Court

Client: epartners

Nature Of Case: Contracts dispute involving claims that Solomon software system was

defective.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Technical consultant.

Law Firm: Foley, Hoag & Eliot-Boston, MA

Disposition: Complete March 2002

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Systems Development

Case Name: Dan Trust v. Hollie B. Smith, Jerome F. Brasch, and Horizon Healthcare

Technologies Ref: [4150]

Jurisdiction: Iowa District Court-Polk County

Client: Dan Trusts

Nature Of Case: Dan Trust purchased an ownership interest in Horizon Healthcare

Technologies. Issues included software system development, project management, system

quality and bug reporting and representations made when purchasing a software development

company.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Litigation support.

Law Firm: Dickinson, Mackman, Tyler & Hagen

Disposition: Complete September 2001.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Package Implementation

Case Name: Ladd Industries v. Accunet, Inc. and Solomon Software, Inc. Ref: [4200]

Jurisdiction: Ohio-Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas

Client: Confidential

Nature Of Case: Ladd purchased Solomon Software system from Accunet. Ladd Industries

claims that software was defective and was not suited for its business needs.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Consulting Technical Expert.

Review and evaluate system requirements, project management and implementation results.

Pre-Trial Discovery.

Law Firm: Rendigs, Fry, Kiely & Dennis-Cincinnati, OH

Disposition: Complete May 2002.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Systems Development

Case Name: Associates in Ophthalmology v. First Insight Corp. Ref: [4250]

Jurisdiction: US-Pennsylvania-Western District

Client: Associates in Ophthalmology, Ltd.

Nature Of Case: Software purchased for Ophthalmology group was defective and did not

perform as represented.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Law Firm: Monte & McGraw-Skippack, PA

Disposition: Complete February 2002.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Internet Security/Hacking

Case Name: United States Of America v. Stephen Lynch - Stephen Lynch v. Omaha World-

Herald Ref: [4300]

Jurisdiction: Nebraska - US District

Client: Lynch, Stephen

Nature Of Case: Internet Web security. Access to a protected Website without

authorization causing damage.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Deposition Testimony.

Review and analysis of computer hard disk, Analysis of Web Server and Firewall Logs,

Law Firm: Fitzgerald, Schorr, Barmettler & Brennan-Omaha, NE

Disposition: Criminal Case Complete August 2001

Civil Suit - Complete February 2004.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Internet Pornography

Case Name: State Of Washington Pl. v. Michael Leavell Def. Ref: [4350]

Jurisdiction: Superior Court, State of Washington - County of Okanogan

Client: M. Leavell - Defendant

Nature Of Case: Internet Pornography. Unlawful Possession of Depictions of Minors Engaged

In Sexually Explicit Conduct, RCW 9.68A.070

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Expert Report.

Testimony at Trial.

Pre-Trial consulting. Acquisition of computer hard disk. Search for and analyze hard disk

contents for email, browser cache contents and other files related to the action. Present

testimony concerning the contents and validity of conclusions to be drawn from the

contents of the seized hard disk.

Law Firm: Roger A. Castelda, Inc., P.S-Tonasket WA

Disposition: Complete November 2000.

Mediation Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Systems Development

Case Name: Dispute over a thirty million dollar computer system that the State of Montana

contends does not perform as required. Unisys, the supplier, contended that the program

worked as required. Ref: [4400]

Jurisdiction: State Of Montana

Client: State Of Montana and UNISYS Corporation

Nature Of Case: State of Montana contracted for Unisys to develop a software program to

handle various taxes collected by the Montana Department of Revenue, including tracking

payments and account balances and processing of refunds.

Services Provided: Mediation Support.

To mediate the dispute involving damages for current delays in the project and to create

a process for preventing problems in the performance of the balance of the contract.

Law Firm: All Firm

Disposition: Complete October 2001.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Internet Pornography

Case Name: United States of America v. Anthony Marchand, M.D. Ref: [4450]

Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court - New Jersey

Client: Anthony Marchand, M.D.

Nature Of Case: Internet Child Pornography. Technical issues presented by Ashcroft v.

Free Speech Supreme Court Decision where Child Pornography created by virtual means is

protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Forensic Analysis of Electronic Media

Expert Report.

Testimony at Trial

Law Firm: Epstein, Becker & Green-Newark, NJ

Disposition: Complete October 2003.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Internet Pornography

Case Name: United States of America v. Ronald Elmquist Ref: [4500]

Jurisdiction: US District Court - Western District of Missouri-Western Division

Client: Elmquist, R.

Nature Of Case: US claims that a computer siezed from Elmquist contained illegal Internet

Pornography. Elmquist claims serious chain of custody issues exist with evidence.

Services Provided: Designated Forensic Expert

Forensic Analysis of Electronic Media

Expert Report

Law Firm: Wyrsch, Hobbs & Mirakain

Disposition: Complete October 2009

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Internet Security/Hacking

Case Name: United States Of America v. Steven Kim Ref: [4510]

Jurisdiction: US District Court Houston Division

Client: Steven Jinwoo KimSteven Jinwoo Kim

Nature Of Case: Kim is accused of illegally accessing the electroniic records of a former

employer and altering the company Oracle data base.

Services Provided: Designated Expert

Expert Report

Law Firm: John Cossum ESQ. - Houston

Disposition: Completed May 2010

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Employment Age/Other Discrimination

Case Name: Michiko Hall v. Rockwell International Corporation Ref: [4550]

Jurisdiction: Superior Court-County of Los Angeles

Client: Michiko Hall

Nature Of Case: Employment Discrimination. Unlawful Termination.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Document discovery requirements. Review of Rockwell operations for relevant information

in order to prepare production requests.

Law Firm: Dayton B. Parcells, Los Angeles, CA

Disposition: Complete June 1994

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Theft Of Software Trade Secrets

Case Name: Internet/Broadband Hardware/Software Co. v. IP Platform Co. Ref: [4600]

Jurisdiction: California-Northern District

Client: Internet/Broadband Hardware/Software Co.

Nature Of Case: Key employees move to new company. Allegations involve theft of trade

secrets and proprietary knowledge.

Services Provided: Consulting Technical Expert.

Pre-filing. Examination of computer hard disk contents.

Law Firm: Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe-Los Angeles, CA

Disposition: Complete June 2002

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Theft Of Software Trade Secrets

Case Name: Process Specialties, Inc. - Pl. v. Sematech, Inc. - Def. Ref: [4650]

Jurisdiction: California-Eastern District

Client: Process Specialities, Inc.

Nature Of Case: Trade secrets

Services Provided: Technical Expert.

Declaration concerning the usability of certain computer file formats as a medium for

data produced during discovery phase.

Law Firm: Herum, Crabtree, Brown, Dyer, Zolezza & Terpstra-Stockton, CA

Disposition: Complete June 2001

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Theft Of Intellectual Property

Case Name: R & R Technologies v. Westerman, Inc. Ref: [4700]

Jurisdiction: Texas District Court - Nueces County

Client: R And R Technologies

Nature Of Case: R and R Claims that Westerman pirated computer software and designs for

hardware which constituted valuable R & R intellectual property.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Law Firm: The Wyatt Law Firm

Disposition: Complete January 2006

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Employment Age/Other Discrimination

Case Name: Aguiniga, Church, Aleesa, Morgan v. Hewlett-Packard Company Ref: [4750]

Jurisdiction: US District-Colorado

Client: Aguiniga, Church, Aleesa, Morgan

Nature Of Case: Employees were terminated for allegedly violating company policy

concerning the use of Email system to transmit sexually explicit material.

Services Provided: Designated Expert.

Review Internet communications including email, usage and policies.

Law Firm: Secor Law-Denver, CO

Disposition: Complete January 2001.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Computer Data Forensic Analysis

Case Name: Jaramillo v. Ford Motor Co. et al Ref: [4800]

Jurisdiction: California-Northern District

Client: Jaramillo

Nature Of Case: Ford Explorer rollover.

Services Provided: Forensic Computer Expert.

Forensic duplication of computer hard disk for analysis.

Law Firm: Stritmatter Kessler Whelan Withey Coluccio

Disposition: Complete June 2003.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Theft Of Software Trade Secrets

Case Name: Manhattan Software v. Jean Kasem and Little Miss Liberty Ref: [4850]

Jurisdiction: Superior Court-County of Los Angeles

Client: Kasem, Jean and Little Miss Liberty

Nature Of Case: Manhattan Software claims Misappropriation of Trade Secrets and

Conversion of Internet purchasing coordination software.

December 2003.

Expert Engagement:

Type Of Matter: Software Copyright Infringement



Contact this candidate