Manager Quality

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY / SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104

1. CONTRACT NUMBER

W912HN10C0031

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

(CONSTRUCTION) 2. CEC NUMBER

INCOMPLETE-RATED 191031975

IMPORTANT: Be sure to complete Part III - Evaluation of Performance Elements on reverse.

PART I - GENERAL CONTRACT DATA

3. TYPE OF EVALUATION (X one) 4. TERMINATED FOR DEFAULT

98 X

INTERIM (List percentage %) FINAL AMENDED

5. CONTRACTOR (Name, Address, and ZIP Code) 6.a. PROCUREMENT METHOD (X one)

TEPA EC, LLC

645 TALLULAH TRAIL, STE 201

X SEALED BID NEGOTIATED

WARNER ROBINS

b. TYPE OF CONTRACT (X one)

GA 31088-762

UNITED STATES X FIRM FIXED PRICE COST REIMBURSEMENT

NAICS Code: 236220 OTHER (Specify)

7. DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION OF WORK

AAFES Troop Store 71065 - BRAC Funded

STATEMENT OF WORK

To construct a 4500 SF Troop Store for the new Harmony Church Barracks to include a 3,800

SF retail store & a 700 sq barber shop. The facility includes an administration office,

merchandise processing area, cargo delivery area, Energy Monitoring and Control System

(EMCS) connection and Antiterrorism measures. Sustainable design and development (SDD)

and Energy Policy Act of 2005 features will be included. Access for individuals with

disabilities will be provided. Supporting facilities include electric service,

information systems and site improvements. This project is a new requirement to support

(continued

8. TYPE AND PERCENT OF SUBCONTRACTING

9% Earthwork

8% Mechanical

8% Electrical

7% Structural Steel

6% Concrete

(continued

a. AMOUNT OF BASIC b. TOTAL AMOUNT OF c. LIQUIDATED d. NET AMOUNT PAID

CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS DAMAGES ASSESSED CONTRACTOR

9. FISCAL DATA

$1,801,351 $15,811 $1,784,002

a. DATE OF AWARD b. ORIGINAL CONTRACT c. REVISED CONTRACT d. DATE WORK

10. SIGNIFICANT COMPLETION DATE COMPLETION DATE ACCEPTED

DATES 05/07/2010 05/27/2011 05/27/2011 03/18/2011

PART II - PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CONTRACTOR

11. OVERALL RATING (X appropriate block)

UNSATISFACTORY (Explain

X OUTSTANDING ABOVE AVERAGE SATISFACTORY MARGINAL

in Item 20 on reverse)

12. EVALUATED BY

a. ORGANIZATION (Name and Address (Include ZIP Code)) b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area

Code)

HARMONY CHURCH RESIDENT OFFICE, FORT BENNING, GA 31995 706-***-****

c. NAME AND TITLE d. SIGNATURE e. DATE

SHANNON L. RICHARDSON, P.E. //Electronically Signed//

RESIDENT ENGINEER 04/20/2011

13. EVALUATION REVIEWED BY

a. ORGANIZATION (Name and Address (Include ZIP Code)) b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area

Code)

c. NAME AND TITLE d. SIGNATURE e. DATE

14. AGENCY USE (Distribution, etc.)

EXCEPTION TO SF 1420 APPROVED BY GSA/IRMS 6-94

DD FORM 2626, JUN 94 (EG)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY / SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104

PART III - EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE ELEMENTS

N/A = NOT APPLICABLE O = OUTSTANDING A = ABOVE AVERAGE S = SATISFACTORY M = MARGINAL U = UNSATISFACTORY

15. QUALITY CONTROL N/A O A S M U 16. EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT N/A O A S M U

X X

a. QUALITY OF WORKMANSHIP a. COOPERATION AND RESPONSIVENESS

X X

b. ADEQUACY OF THE CQC PLAN b. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES/

PERSONNEL

X

c. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CQC

PLAN X

c. COORDINATION AND CONTROL OF

SUBCONTRACTOR(S)

X

d. QUALITY OF QC

DOCUMENTATION X

d. ADEQUACY OF SITE CLEAN-UP

X X

e. STORAGE OF MATERIALS e. EFFECTIVENESS OF JOB-SITE

SUPERVISION

X

f. ADEQUACY OF MATERIALS

X X

g. ADEQUACY OF SUBMITTALS f. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND

REGULATIONS

X

h. ADEQUACY OF QC TESTING

X X

i. ADEQUACY OF AS-BUILTS g. PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

X X

j. USE OF SPECIFIED MATERIALS h. REVIEW/RESOLUTION OF

SUBCONTRACTOR'S ISSUES

X

k. IDENTIFICATION/CORRECTION OF

DEFICIENT WORK IN A TIMELY X

i. IMPLEMENTATION OF

MANNER SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

17. TIMELY PERFORMANCE 18. COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR

STANDARDS

X

a. ADEQUACY OF INITIAL PROGRESS

SCHEDULE X

a. CORRECTION OF NOTED DEFICIENCIES

X X

b. ADHERENCE TO APPROVED b. PAYROLLS PROPERLY COMPLETED

SCHEDULE AND SUBMITTED

X

c. COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR LAWS

X

c. RESOLUTION OF DELAYS

AND REGULATIONS WITH SPECIFIC

X

d. SUBMISSION OF REQUIRED

ATTENTION TO THE DAVIS-BACON

DOCUMENTATION ACT AND EEO REQUIREMENTS

X

e. COMPLETION OF PUNCHLIST 19. COMPLIANCE WITH SAFETY

ITEMS STANDARDS

X X

f. SUBMISSION OF UPDATED AND a. ADEQUACY OF SAFETY PLAN

REVISED PROGRESS SCHEDULES X

b. IMPLEMENTATION OF SAFETY PLAN

X X

g. WARRANTY RESPONSE c. CORRECTION OF NOTED DEFICIENCIES

20. REMARKS (Explanation of unsatisfactory evaluation is required. Other comments are optional. Provide facts concerning specific events

or actions to justify the evaluation. These data must be in sufficient detail to assist contracting officers in determining the contractor's

responsibility. Continue on separate sheet(s), if needed.)

Small Business Utilization

Does this contract include a subcontracting plan? No

Is small business subcontracting under this contract included in a comprehensive small business subcontracting plan? N/A

Is small business subcontracting under this contract included in a commercial small business subcontracting plan? N/A

Date of last Individual Subcontracting Report (ISR) / Summary Subcontracting Report (SSR): N/A

EVALUATOR REMARKS: The contractor, Tepa EC, received an overall 'Outstanding' rating on

the subject contract based on workmanship, quality of materials, safety, scheduling, and

job management. The soldier's quality of life will be improved by this facility. The

contractor's dedicated efforts to the high quality product, delivered ten weeks ahead of

schedule, was noted and appreciated by USACE and the customer, AAFES.

From the beginning of the contract, Tepa, worked aggressively to meet or beat their

schedule. Nelson Padgett, supervisor, and Greg Gentry, QC manager, worked diligently,

managing and coordinating subcontractors to complete work in a quality and timely manner.

Because of their efforts, the customer was able to occupy their building two months ahead

of schedule and open for business earlier than anticipated.

Tepa's careful selection of subcontractors proved to be outstanding. The subcontractors

were responsive and their workmanship was of good quality. Of particular note were ACCI

who responded several times to grading needs in a timely manner, and Holcomb Construction

Co. whose concrete expertise lent itself to many instances with this project.

All personnel with Tepa conducted themselves in a professional manner when resolving

issues and in daily communication. There were very few significant issues as a result of

Tepa's active involvement in the project. Throughout the project, Eric Anania, project

manager, was responsive to issues and worked doggedly for solutions that satisfied goals

of quality, timeliness, and costs. It is noted that Eric Anania contributed a good deal

of his time and resources to the LEED modification that did not come to pass.

Due to the proactive safety program, the contractor had no lost time accidents during the

(continued

DD FORM 2626 (BACK), JUN 94

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY / SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104

7. DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION OF WORK continued)

the Armor School that is moving from Fort Knox and consolidating with other maneuver

schools on Fort Benning (Harmony Church). Air Conditioning (Estimated 15 Tons).

Fort Benning, GA

8. TYPE AND PERCENT OF SUBCONTRACTING continued)

5% Drywall/Gypsum Board

3% Masonry

3% Specialities

2% Windows/Glazing

1% Roofing

1% Fire Protection-Systems

1% Painting/Wall Covering

1% Landscaping/Irrigation

1% Flooring/Tile

20. REMARKS continued)

course of the contract. Tepa received the Fort Benning "Serious About Safety" award in

the 4th quarter of 2010.

The USACE enjoyed working with Tepa and looks forward to future opportunities to work

together again.

DD FORM 2626 (CONTINUED), JUN 94 3

Contact this candidate